ArticleThe AAPS journal2017
A LC-MS All-in-One Workflow for Site-Specific Location, Identification and Quantification of N-/O- Glycosylation in Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Drug Products.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis Strategy for Identifying theMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Strategies for Proteome-Wide Quantification of Glycosylation Macro- and Micro-Heterogeneity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Exploring the Chemical Space of Protein Glycosylation in Noncovalent Protein Complexes: An Expedition along Different Structural Levels of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin by Employing Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2021Article
- A Perspective on the Confident Comparison of Glycoprotein Site-Specific Glycosylation in Sample Cohorts.Biochemistry · 2020Review
- Mass Spectrometry Approaches to Glycomic and Glycoproteomic Analyses.Chemical reviews · 2018Review
- Analysis of Mammalian O-Glycopeptides-We Have Made a Good Start, but There is a Long Way to Go.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Site-specific characterization of the N- and O-linked glycosylation on a set of different human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) drug products was performed by a LC-MS method combining high resolution (120K at m/z 200) mass spectrometry, multiple dissociation methods, tandem mass tag (TMT 10plex) labeling, and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). In total, the data provided identification, relative quantification, and comparison of site-specific glycosylation of protein therapeutics with a single experiment. Ten different lots and/or brands of commercial therapeutic hCG were labeled with TMT 10plex reagents after tryptic digestion. The labeled intact glycopeptides were then analyzed by high resolution LC-MS with online alternating HCD/ETD/CID dissociation methods. For digested hCG drugs, 1000 intact N- and O-linked glycopeptides were identified. The relative amount of each glycopeptide from hCG products was determined based on the reporter signal intensities of the TMT labeling reagents. Moreover, with the help of TMT 10plex, through just one LC-MS run, PLS-DA was performed to ascertain the differences in glycosylation among different sources of hCG drug products. The results of PLS-DA showed that 167 glycopeptides were found to be significantly different between the naturally derived and recombinant hCG products. The results demonstrate the suitability of this method for similarity assessments and counterfeit identification of hCG as well as other glycoproteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.