Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28247014›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2017

Electrophysiological measures of temporal resolution, contrast sensitivity and spatial resolving power in sharks.

Laura A Ryan, Jan M Hemmi, Shaun P Collin, Nathan S Hart

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Physiological properties of the visual system in the Green Weaver ant, Oecophylla smaragdina.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  5. NocturnaliScience · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Temporal vision: measures, mechanisms and meaning.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Visual discrimination and resolution in freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon motoro).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura A RyanSchool of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. laura.ryan@research.uwa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8981-286X
Jan M HemmiSchool of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Shaun P CollinSchool of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Nathan S HartSchool of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
The University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most animals, vision plays an important role in detecting prey, predators and conspecifics. The effectiveness of vision in assessing cues such as motion and shape is influenced by the ability of the visual system to detect changes in contrast in both space and time. Understanding the role vision plays in shark behaviour has been limited by a lack of knowledge about their temporal resolution, contrast sensitivity and spatial resolution. In this study, an electrophysiological approach was used to compare these measures across five species of sharks: Chiloscyllium punctatum, Heterodontus portusjacksoni, Hemiscyllium ocellatum, Mustelus mustelus and Haploblepharus edwardsii. All shark species were highly sensitive to brightness contrast and were able to detect contrast differences as low as 1.6%. Temporal resolution of flickering stimuli ranged from 28 to 44 Hz. Species that inhabit brighter environments were found to have higher temporal resolution. Spatial resolving power was estimated in C. punctatum, H. portusjacksoni and H. ocellatum and ranged from 0.10 to 0.35 cycles per degree, which is relatively low compared to other vertebrates. These results suggest that sharks have retinal adaptations that enhance contrast sensitivity at the expense of temporal and spatial resolution, which is beneficial for vision in dimly lit and/or low contrast aquatic environments.

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast SensitivityElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleForm PerceptionMalePhotic StimulationSharksSpace PerceptionTime FactorsTime PerceptionAcuityCritical flicker fusion frequencyElasmobranchElectroretinogramVisual contrast

Identifiers

PMID28247014
OpenAlexW2592115138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.