Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28246971›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2017

Bilateral synergy as an index of force coordination in chronic stroke.

Nyeonju Kang, James H Cauraugh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Force/moment tracking performance during constant-pose, force-varying, bilaterally symmetric, hand-wrist tasks.Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nyeonju KangLaboratory for Rehabilitation Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
James H CauraughMotor Behavior Laboratory, Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-8206, USA. cauraugh@ufl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysfunction in bilateral coordination post-stroke is responsible for impaired bilateral movements. This study examined bilateral synergies using the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach while individuals in a chronic stage after stroke executed bilateral isometric force control at three submaximal force levels. Nine patients with stroke and nine age-matched healthy controls performed 24 trials of wrist and fingers extension at 5, 25, and 50% of MVC. The UCM findings revealed: (a) decreased bilateral synergies in patients with stroke as compared to controls at 50% of MVC and (b) reduced good variability and increased bad variability components in patients with stroke at 50% of MVC. Moreover, correlation analyses across both groups showed that a reduction of bilateral synergies was related to increased force error at 50% of MVC and an inconsistent force ratio between the two hands across multiple trials correlated with increased good and bad variability at 5% of MVC. Current findings indicate that quantifying bilateral synergies may provide meaningful profiles for estimating impairments as well as improvements of cooperative behaviors between two hands post-stroke.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceCase-Control StudiesChronic DiseaseFeedback, SensoryFemaleFingersFunctional LateralityHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor DisordersStatistics as TopicBilateral force controlBilateral synergiesCoordinationStrokeUncontrolled manifoldUpper extremity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.