Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28246884›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2017

Post-fracture care: do we need to educate patients rather than doctors? The PREVOST randomized controlled trial.

B Merle, R Chapurlat, E Vignot, T Thomas, J Haesebaert, A-M Schott

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01780012 (Secondary Prevention of Osteoporosis in Women Over 50 Years Old After Low Intensity Fracture of the Upper Limb), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01780012 nacompletednot on this map

Secondary Prevention of Osteoporosis in Women Over 50 Years Old After Low Intensity Fracture of the Upper Limb: Evaluation of an Intervention Focused on the Patient.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2012 to 2014Enrolled436ConditionsOsteoporosis With Current Fragility FractureArmsOsteoporosis prevention program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions to improve osteoporosis care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. How Can We Improve Osteoporosis Care? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Quality Improvement Strategies for Osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: systematic literature review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The global approach to rehabilitation following an osteoporotic fragility fracture: A review of the rehabilitation working group of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) committee of scientific advisors.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Higher rates of osteoporosis treatment initiation and persistence in patients with newly diagnosed vertebral fracture when introduced in inpatients than later in outpatients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Osteoporosis prevention: where are the barriers to improvement in a French general population? A qualitative study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B MerleINSERM Unit 1033, Université de Lyon, Service de Rhumatologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. blandine.merle@inserm.fr.
R ChapurlatINSERM Unit 1033, Université de Lyon, Service de Rhumatologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
E VignotINSERM Unit 1033, Université de Lyon, Service de Rhumatologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
T ThomasService de Rhumatologie, INSERM Unit 1059, Hôpital Bellevue, Saint-Etienne, France.
J HaesebaertHospices Civils de Lyon, EA 7425 HeSPeR Unit, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
A-M SchottHospices Civils de Lyon, EA 7425 HeSPeR Unit, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRInserm · FRHealth Services and Performance Research Laboratory · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a population-based patient-centered post-fracture care program with a dedicated case manager, PREVention of OSTeoporosis (PREVOST), on appropriate post-fracture osteoporosis management. We showed that, compared to usual care, BMD investigation post-fracture was significantly improved (+20%) by our intervention program.

introductionOur study aims to evaluate the impact of a population-based patient-centered post-fracture care program, PREVOST, on appropriate post-fracture care.

methodsMulticenter, randomized controlled trial enrolling 436 women aged 50 to 85 years and attending a French hospital, for a low-energy fracture of the wrist or humerus. Randomization was stratified by age, hospital department, and site of fracture. The intervention was performed by a trained case manager who interacted only with the patients, with repeated oral and written information about fragility fractures and osteoporosis management, and prompting them to visit their primary care physicians. Control group received usual care. The primary outcome was the initiation of an appropriate post-fracture care defined by Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and/or anti-osteoporotic treatment prescription at 6 months.

resultsAt 6 months, 53% of women in intervention group initiated a post-fracture care versus 33% for usual care (adjOR 2.35, 95%CI [1.58-3.50], p < 0.001). Post-fracture care was more frequent after wrist than humerus fracture (adjOR 1.93, 95%CI [1.14-3.30], p = 0.015) and decreased with age (adjOR for 10 years increase 0.76, 95%CI [0.61-0.96], p = 0.02). The intervention resulted in BMD prescription in 50% of patients (adjOR 2.10, 95%CI [1.41-3.11], p < 0.001) and in BMD performance in 41% of patients (adjOR 2.12, 95%CI [1.40-3.20], p < 0.001) versus 33 and 25% for usual care, respectively. Having performed a BMD increased treatment prescription; however, only 46% of women with a low BMD requiring a treatment according to the French guidelines received a prescription.

conclusionA patient-centered care program with a dedicated case manager can significantly improve post-fracture BMD investigation.

Indexed as

AgedBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDrug PrescriptionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceGuideline AdherenceHumansHumeral FracturesMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicBone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosisOsteoporotic fracturesPatient empowermentRandomized controlled trialSecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID28246884
OpenAlexW2594671931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.