Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28246687›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2017

[Multimorbidity management and the physician's daily clinical dilemma].

E Battegay, M Cheetham, B M Holzer, A Nowak, D Schmidt, S Rampini

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E BattegayKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz. edouard.battegay@usz.ch.
M CheethamKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz.
B M HolzerKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz.
A NowakKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz.
D SchmidtKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz.
S RampiniKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zürich, Schweiz.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About 20-25% of all persons and about 90% of all patients who are acutely hospitalized in internal medicine departments have multiple acute or chronic diseases. They are multimorbid. The encounter with multimorbid patients has become the most common situation in the health care system. Theoretically, multimorbidity results in an innumerable potential disease constellations. In addition, the likelihood of interactions between diseases (disease-disease interactions, DDI) and the complexity increases overproportionately with each additional disease. However, multimorbidity often occurs in typical diadic, triadic, or higher characteristic combinations, in "disease clusters", e. g., vascular risk factors, heart and lung diseases, Frailty and dementia, psychiatric and somatic disorders. Such combinations lead to a worsening of the overall prognosis. In addition, DDIs are often difficult to treat or are life-threatening. Examples of DDIs include the following: anticoagulation and simultaneous severe bleeding, pain treatment and hypertension or renal insufficiency, depression and reduced medication adherence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression, Frailty and neurodepressant drugs and frequent falls, and combined psychiatric and somatic disorders. Such DDIs are common. Nevertheless, there are few studies and clinical guidelines that address these issues. The care of multimorbid patients is, therefore, heavily reliant upon guidelines developed mostly for single diseases. However, multimorbidity and serious DDIs are usually not addressed in these. Clinical guidelines can thus inadvertently jeopardize the safety of persons suffering from multiple diseases. In addition, stressful dilemmas arise for physicians encountering DDIs because of difficult treatment decisions.

Indexed as

ComorbidityDelivery of Health CareChronic DiseaseHumansAnticoagulantsDisease–disease interactionsHemorrhageHypertensionPain, drug therapy

Identifiers

PMID28246687
OpenAlexW2592413773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.