Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28246630›Full record

ArticleScience advances2017

Revealing physical interaction networks from statistics of collective dynamics.

Mor Nitzan, Jose Casadiego, Marc Timme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Predicting network dynamics without requiring the knowledge of the interaction graph.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The brainstem connectome database.Scientific data · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A practical method for estimating coupling functions in complex dynamical systems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mor NitzanRacah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel.; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9112001 Jerusalem, Israel.; School of Computer Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel.
Jose CasadiegoNetwork Dynamics, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.; International Max Planck Research School for Physics of Biological and Complex Systems, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Marc TimmeNetwork Dynamics, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.; International Max Planck Research School for Physics of Biological and Complex Systems, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.; Technical University of Dresden, Institute for Theoretical Physics, 01062 Dresden, Germany.; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.; Department of Physics, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revealing physical interactions in complex systems from observed collective dynamics constitutes a fundamental inverse problem in science. Current reconstruction methods require access to a system's model or dynamical data at a level of detail often not available. We exploit changes in invariant measures, in particular distributions of sampled states of the system in response to driving signals, and use compressed sensing to reveal physical interaction networks. Dynamical observations following driving suffice to infer physical connectivity even if they are temporally disordered, are acquired at large sampling intervals, and stem from different experiments. Testing various nonlinear dynamic processes emerging on artificial and real network topologies indicates high reconstruction quality for existence as well as type of interactions. These results advance our ability to reveal physical interaction networks in complex synthetic and natural systems.

Indexed as

gene networksnetwork dynamicsnetwork reconstructionnonlinear dynamicsphysical connectivitystructural connectivity

Identifiers

PMID28246630
PMCPMC5302872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.