ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2017
Salient concerns in using analgesia for cancer pain among outpatients: A cluster analysis study.
Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cannabis and opioid perceptions, co-use, and substitution among patients across 4 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024Article
- Gaps in the Use of Long-Acting Opioids Within Intervals of Consecutive Days Among Cancer Outpatients Using Electronic Pill Caps.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2021Observational
- The Association Between Analgesic Treatment Beliefs and Electronically Monitored Adherence for Cancer Pain.Oncology nursing forum · 2021Article
- Palliative Care's Role Managing Cancer Pain During the Opioid Crisis: A Qualitative Study of Patients, Caregivers, and Clinicians.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2020Article
- "No thanks, I don't want to see snakes again": a qualitative study of pain management versus preservation of cognition in palliative care patients.BMC palliative care · 2020Article
- Patient Trade-Offs Related to Analgesic Use for Cancer Pain: A MaxDiff Analysis Study.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo identify unique clusters of patients based on their concerns in using analgesia for cancer pain and predictors of the cluster membership.
methodsThis was a 3-mo prospective observational study (
resultsThe analyses found 4 unique clusters: Most patients made trade-offs based on the expectation of pain relief (cluster 1, 41%). For a subset, the main underlying concern was type of analgesic prescribed,
conclusionMost patients appear to be driven by a single salient concern in using analgesia for cancer pain. Addressing these concerns, perhaps through real time clinical assessments, may improve patients' analgesic adherence patterns and cancer pain outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.