Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28246406›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2017

Evaluation of Recombinant Human FGF-2 and PDGF-BB in Periodontal Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Feifei Li, Fanyuan Yu, Xin Xu, Chunjie Li, Dingming Huang, Xuedong Zhou, Ling Ye, Liwei Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Role of FGF2 in promoting osteogenic differentiation for craniofacial bone regeneration.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Feifei LiState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Fanyuan YuState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xin XuState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chunjie LiState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Dingming HuangState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xuedong ZhouState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ling YeState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. yeling@scu.edu.cn.
Liwei ZhengState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. liwei.zheng@scu.edu.cn.
Sichuan University · CNState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognosis for successful treatment of periodontal diseases is generally poor. Current therapeutic strategies often fail to regenerate infected periodontium. Recently an alternative strategy has been developed that combines conventional treatment with the application of recombinant human growth factors (rhGFs). But ambiguities in existed studies on the clinical efficacy of rhGFs do not permit either the identification of the specific growth factors effective for therapeutic interventions or the optimal concentration of them. Neither is it known whether the same rhGF can stimulate regeneration of both soft tissue and bone, or whether different patient populations call for differential use of the growth factors. In order to explore these issues, a meta-analysis was carried out. Particular attention was given to the therapeutic impact of fibroblast growth factor 2(FGF-2) and platelet derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB). Our findings indicate that 0.3% rhFGF-2 and 0.3 mg/ml rhPDGF-BB show a greater capacity for periodontal regeneration than other concentrations and superiority to control groups with statistical significance. In the case of patients suffering only from gingival recession, however, the application of rhPDGF-BB produces no significant regenerative advantage. The findings of this study can potentially endow clinicians with guidelines for the appropriate application of these two rhGFs.

Indexed as

BecaplerminDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFibroblast Growth Factor 2HumansPeriodontal DiseasesPeriodontiumProto-Oncogene Proteins c-sisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecombinant ProteinsRegenerationTreatment OutcomeBecaplerminFibroblast Growth Factor 2Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-sisRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28246406
PMCPMC5427916
OpenAlexW2594883055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.