SynthesisCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2017
Considering benefits and harms of duloxetine for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of clinical study reports.
Synthesis in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of electrical stimulation for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2022Pooled it
- Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: comparison of trial data from clinical study reports with corresponding trial register entries and journal publications.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Benefits and harms of antipsychotic drugs in drug-naïve patients with psychosis: A systematic review.The International journal of risk & safety in medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Long-term harms from previous use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A systematic review.The International journal of risk & safety in medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Cognitive behavioural therapy halves the risk of repeated suicide attempts: systematic review.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Modafinil Versus Amphetamine-Dextroamphetamine For Idiopathic Hypersomnia and Narcolepsy Type 2: A Randomized, Blinded, Non-inferiority Trial.CNS drugs · 2024Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of TAS-303 in Female Patients With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.The Journal of urology · 2024Trial
- A randomized, intervention parallel multicentre study to evaluate duloxetine and innovative pelvic floor muscle training in women with uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence-the DULOXING study.International urogynecology journal · 2021Trial
- Efficacy and safety of the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, TAS-303, in women with stress urinary incontinence: Results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, early phase II trial.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2021Trial
- Review
- Diagnosis and management of urinary incontinence in females.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Review
- Comparative risk of psychiatric comorbidities associated with codeine and tramadol in patients with hip osteoarthritis: a nationwide population-based cohort study.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Pharmacotherapy in Stress Urinary Incontinence; A Literature Review.Current urology reports · 2024Review
- The effect of duloxetine on stress urinary incontinence.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Management of mixed urinary incontinence: IUGA committee opinion.International urogynecology journal · 2024Review
- Age-Dependent Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023Article
- Mixed urinary incontinence: Are there effective treatments?Neurourology and urodynamics · 2023Article
- Repurposing drugs to treat cardiovascular disease in the era of precision medicine.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Review
- Tolerability of duloxetine in elderly and in non-elderly adults: a protocol of a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe European Medicines Agency makes clinical study reports publicly available and publishes reasons for not approving applications for marketing authorization. Duloxetine has been approved in Europe for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. The reported adverse effects of duloxetine include mental health problems and suicidality. We obtained clinical study reports from the European Medicines Agency concerning use of this drug for stress urinary incontinence.
methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of 4 randomized placebo-controlled trials of duloxetine (involving a total of 1913 patients) submitted to the European Medicines Agency for marketing approval for the indication of stress urinary incontinence in women. We used data from the clinical study reports (totalling 6870 pages and including individual patient data) to assess benefits (including frequency of incontinence and changes in quality-of-life scores, such as Patient Global Impression of Improvement rating) and harms (both general harms, including discontinuation because of adverse events, and harms related to suicidality, violent behaviour and their potential precursors, such as akathisia and activation [stimulating effects such as insomnia, anxiety and agitation]).
resultsDuloxetine was significantly better than placebo in terms of percentage change in weekly incontinence episodes (mean difference -13.56%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -21.59% to -5.53%) and change in Incontinence Quality of Life total score (mean difference 3.24, 95% CI 2.00 to 4.48). However, the effect sizes were small, and a sensitivity analysis (with removal of one trial) showed that the number needed to treat for a Patient Global Impression of Improvement rating of "much better or very much better" was 8 (95% CI 6 to 13). The numbers needed to harm were 7 (95% CI 6 to 8) for discontinuing because of an adverse event and 7 (95% CI 6 to 9) for experiencing an activation event. No suicidality, violence or akathisia events were noted.
interpretationAlthough duloxetine is effective for stress urinary incontinence in women, the rates of associated harm were high when individual patient data were analyzed, and the harms outweighed the benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.