ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2017
Synthetic Botany.
Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expanding the palette of cis-elements to tune the expression of chloroplast transgenes in tobacco.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- The landscape of transcription factor promoter activity during vegetative development in Marchantia.The Plant cell · 2024Article
- Engineering Plant Cell Fates and Functions for Agriculture and Industry.ACS synthetic biology · 2024Review
- Synthetic Biology─High Time to Deliver?ACS synthetic biology · 2023Article
- Tuning the Transcriptional Activity of the CaMV 35S Promoter in Plants by Single-Nucleotide Changes in the TATA Box.ACS synthetic biology · 2023Article
- The renaissance and enlightenment of Marchantia as a model system.The Plant cell · 2022Article
- Using positional information to provide context for biological image analysis with MorphoGraphX 2.0.eLife · 2022Article
- Construction of DNA Tools for Hyperexpression inACS synthetic biology · 2021Article
- Beyond natural: synthetic expansions of botanical form and function.The New phytologist · 2020Review
- Engineering pattern formation and morphogenesis.Biochemical Society transactions · 2020Review
- The Synthetic Biology Toolkit for Photosynthetic Microorganisms.Plant physiology · 2019Review
- Recent Advances and Current Challenges in Synthetic Biology of the Plastid Genetic System and Metabolism.Plant physiology · 2019Review
- Engineering Strategies to Boost Crop Productivity by Cutting Respiratory Carbon Loss.The Plant cell · 2019Review
- Article
- Co-expression and Transcriptome Analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Article
- Network-based approaches to quantify multicellular development.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Review
- Optogenetic control of transgene expression inApplications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Plants are attractive platforms for synthetic biology and metabolic engineering. Plants' modular and plastic body plans, capacity for photosynthesis, extensive secondary metabolism, and agronomic systems for large-scale production make them ideal targets for genetic reprogramming. However, efforts in this area have been constrained by slow growth, long life cycles, the requirement for specialized facilities, a paucity of efficient tools for genetic manipulation, and the complexity of multicellularity. There is a need for better experimental and theoretical frameworks to understand the way genetic networks, cellular populations, and tissue-wide physical processes interact at different scales. We highlight new approaches to the DNA-based manipulation of plants and the use of advanced quantitative imaging techniques in simple plant models such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.