Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28246098›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Opiate addiction and overdose: experiences, attitudes, and appetite for community naloxone provision.

Tomás Barry, Jan Klimas, Helen Tobin, Mairead Egan, Gerard Bury

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. No laughing matter.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  3. Opioid analgesic dependence: where do we go from here?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomás BarryCentre for Emergency Medical Science, School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jan KlimasCentre for Emergency Medical Science, School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Department of Medicine, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver BC, Canada.
Helen TobinCentre for Emergency Medical Science, School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Mairead EganCentre for Emergency Medical Science, School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Gerard BuryCentre for Emergency Medical Science, School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 200 opiate overdose deaths occur annually in Ireland. Overdose prevention and management, including naloxone prescription, should be a priority for healthcare services. Naloxone is an effective overdose treatment and is now being considered for wider lay use.

aimTo establish GPs' views and experiences of opiate addiction, overdose care, and naloxone provision. DESIGN AND

settingAn anonymous postal survey to GPs affiliated with the Department of Academic General Practice, University College Dublin, Ireland.

methodA total of 714 GPs were invited to complete an anonymous postal survey. Results were compared with a parallel GP trainee survey.

resultsA total of 448/714 (62.7%) GPs responded. Approximately one-third of GPs were based in urban, rural, and mixed areas. Over 75% of GPs who responded had patients who used illicit opiates, and 25% prescribed methadone. Two-thirds of GPs were in favour of increased naloxone availability in the community; almost one-third would take part in such a scheme. A higher proportion of GP trainees had used naloxone to treat opiate overdose than qualified GPs. In addition, a higher proportion of GP trainees were willing to be involved in naloxone distribution than qualified GPs. Intranasal naloxone was much preferred to single (

conclusionGPs report extensive contact with people who have opiate use disorders but provide limited opiate agonist treatment. They support wider availability of naloxone and would participate in its expansion. Development and evaluation of an implementation strategy to support GP-based distribution is urgently needed.

Indexed as

General PracticeDrug OverdoseEducation, Medical, GraduateHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIrelandNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersPractice Patterns, Physicians'Preventive Health ServicesProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonistsfamily practicemedical educationmethadoneoverdose education and naloxone distributionsubstance-related disorders

Identifiers

PMID28246098
PMCPMC5565826
OpenAlexW2594362475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.