Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28245872›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2017

Public sector low threshold office-based buprenorphine treatment: outcomes at year 7.

Elenore Patterson Bhatraju, Ellie Grossman, Babak Tofighi, Jennifer McNeely, Danae DiRocco, Mara Flannery, Ann Garment, Keith Goldfeld, Marc N Gourevitch, Joshua D Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Routes of non-traditional entry into buprenorphine treatment programs.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elenore Patterson BhatrajuDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, 227 East 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Ellie GrossmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Babak TofighiDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, 227 East 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Jennifer McNeelyDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, 227 East 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Danae DiRoccoDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, 227 East 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Mara FlanneryDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, 227 East 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Ann GarmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Keith GoldfeldDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, 227 East 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Marc N GourevitchDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, 227 East 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Joshua D LeeDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. joshua.lee@nyumc.org.
New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBuprenorphine maintenance for opioid dependence remains of limited availability among underserved populations, despite increases in US opioid misuse and overdose deaths. Low threshold primary care treatment models including the use of unobserved, "home," buprenorphine induction may simplify initiation of care and improve access. Unobserved induction and long-term treatment outcomes have not been reported recently among large, naturalistic cohorts treated in low threshold safety net primary care settings.

methodsThis prospective clinical registry cohort design estimated rates of induction-related adverse events, treatment retention, and urine opioid results for opioid dependent adults offered buprenorphine maintenance in a New York City public hospital primary care office-based practice from 2006 to 2013. This clinic relied on typical ambulatory care individual provider-patient visits, prescribed unobserved induction exclusively, saw patients no more than weekly, and did not require additional psychosocial treatment. Unobserved induction consisted of an in-person screening and diagnostic visit followed by a 1-week buprenorphine written prescription, with pamphlet, and telephone support. Primary outcomes analyzed were rates of induction-related adverse events (AE), week 1 drop-out, and long-term treatment retention. Factors associated with treatment retention were examined using a Cox proportional hazard model among inductions and all patients. Secondary outcomes included overall clinic retention, buprenorphine dosages, and urine sample results.

resultsOf the 485 total patients in our registry, 306 were inducted, and 179 were transfers already on buprenorphine. Post-induction (n = 306), week 1 drop-out was 17%. Rates of any induction-related AE were 12%; serious adverse events, 0%; precipitated withdrawal, 3%; prolonged withdrawal, 4%. Treatment retention was a median 38 weeks (range 0-320) for inductions, compared to 110 (0-354) weeks for transfers and 57 for the entire clinic population. Older age, later years of first clinic visit (vs. 2006-2007), and baseline heroin abstinence were associated with increased treatment retention overall.

conclusionsUnobserved "home" buprenorphine induction in a public sector primary care setting appeared a feasible and safe clinical practice. Post-induction treatment retention of a median 38 weeks was in line with previous naturalistic studies of real-world office-based opioid treatment. Low threshold treatment protocols, as compared to national guidelines, may compliment recently increased prescriber patient limits and expand access to buprenorphine among public sector opioid use disorder patients.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareBuprenorphineCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNarcotic AntagonistsNew YorkOffice VisitsOpioid-Related DisordersUnited StatesBuprenorphineNarcotic AntagonistsBuprenorphineInductionOffice-based treatmentOpioid dependencePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID28245872
PMCPMC5331716
OpenAlexW2594272477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.