Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28245850›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2017

Interaction of silver nanoparticles with algae and fish cells: a side by side comparison.

Yang Yue, Xiaomei Li, Laura Sigg, Marc J-F Suter, Smitha Pillai, Renata Behra, Kristin Schirmer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Assessing Fish Immunotoxicity by Means ofFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Nanomaterials in Wound Healing and Infection Control.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yang YueDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Xiaomei LiDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Laura SiggDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Marc J-F SuterDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Smitha PillaiDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Renata BehraDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland. renata.behra@eawag.ch.
Kristin SchirmerDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland. kristin.schirmer@eawag.ch.
ETH Zurich · CHÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHSwiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSilver nanoparticles (AgNP) are widely applied and can, upon use, be released into the aquatic environment. This raises concerns about potential impacts of AgNP on aquatic organisms. We here present a side by side comparison of the interaction of AgNP with two contrasting cell types: algal cells, using the algae Euglena gracilis as model, and fish cells, a cell line originating from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) gill (RTgill-W1). The comparison is based on the AgNP behavior in exposure media, toxicity, uptake and interaction with proteins.

results(1) The composition of exposure media affected AgNP behavior and toxicity to algae and fish cells. (2) The toxicity of AgNP to algae was mediated by dissolved silver while nanoparticle specific effects in addition to dissolved silver contributed to the toxicity of AgNP to fish cells. (3) AgNP did not enter into algal cells; they only adsorbed onto the cell surface. In contrast, AgNP were taken up by fish cells via endocytic pathways. (4) AgNP can bind to both extracellular and intracellular proteins and inhibit enzyme activity.

conclusionOur results showed that fish cells take up AgNP in contrast to algal cells, where AgNP sorbed onto the cell surface, which indicates that the cell wall of algae is a barrier to particle uptake. This particle behaviour results in different responses to AgNP exposure in algae and fish cells. Yet, proteins from both cell types can be affected by AgNP exposure: for algae, extracellular proteins secreted from cells for, e.g., nutrient acquisition. For fish cells, intracellular and/or membrane-bound proteins, such as the Na

Indexed as

AdsorptionAlkaline PhosphataseAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell LineCulture MediaEndocytosisEuglena gracilisFish ProteinsGillsMetal NanoparticlesMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionOncorhynchus mykissParticle SizeSilverSodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPaseAlkaline PhosphataseCulture MediaFish ProteinsSilverSodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPaseWater Pollutants, ChemicalAgNPEuglena gracilisNanoparticle-protein interactionsNanoparticle toxicityNanoparticle uptakeRTgill-W1 cell line

Identifiers

PMID28245850
PMCPMC5331694
OpenAlexW2592686543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.