Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28245825›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2017

Predictors of correct technique in patients using pressurized metered dose inhalers.

Kyra Bartolo, Martin Balzan, Emma Louise Schembri, Rachelle Asciak, Darlene Mercieca Balbi, Michael Pace Bardon, Stephen Montefort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Factors associated with improper metered-dose inhaler technique among adults with asthma in a primary care clinic in Malaysia.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Asthma and COPD Patients' Perception of Appropriate Metered-Dose Inhaler Technique.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kyra BartoloMater Dei Hospital, Dun Karm Street, Msida, Malta. kyrabartolo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4777-3591
Martin BalzanMater Dei Hospital, Dun Karm Street, Msida, Malta.
Emma Louise SchembriMater Dei Hospital, Dun Karm Street, Msida, Malta.
Rachelle AsciakMater Dei Hospital, Dun Karm Street, Msida, Malta.
Darlene Mercieca BalbiMater Dei Hospital, Dun Karm Street, Msida, Malta.
Michael Pace BardonMater Dei Hospital, Dun Karm Street, Msida, Malta.
Stephen MontefortMater Dei Hospital, Dun Karm Street, Msida, Malta.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorret inhaler technique is recommended by guidelines for optimum asthma care. The objective of the study is to determine real life predictors of correct pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) technique in Asthma and COPD patients.

methodsTwo hundred eight adult patients aged 18+ from respiratory outpatients (69.2%) and the community on regular pMDI for a diagnosis of Asthma (78.9%) or COPD, were recruited. A questionnaire containing 31 possible predictors was administered and pMDI technique with or without spacer was observed by trained researchers on 12 point steps, of which 4 were considered critical.

results23.1% of patients had no errors in inhaler technique and 32.2% had no critical errors. Patients had a median of 10 correct steps (IQR9-11), and 3(IQR2-4) correct critical steps. Using binary logistic regression the predictors of 10 correct steps were, other healthcare professional (pharmacist, nurse, physiotherapist) explained OR 3.73(1.63-8.54, p = 0.001), male gender 2.70(1.35-5.39, p = 0.004), self-score 1-10 1.21(1.05-1.39, p = 0.007), spacer use 0.38(0.19-0.79, p = 0.007), inhaled steroid 3.71(1.34-10.25, p = 0.01), heart disease 0.31(0.13-0.77, p = 0.01), pneumococcal vaccine 2.48(1.0-6.15, p = 0.043), education level 1-4 1.44(1.00-2.06, p = 0.05) and respiratory physician explained 0-7 times, 1.11(0.99-1.26, p = 0.08). Using ordinal logistic regression, predictors for correct critical steps 0-4, were: technique self-score 1-10 1.2(1.05-1.42, p = 0.006), inhaled corticosteroid use 2.78(1.1-7.31, p = 0.03) and education level 1-4 1.41(1.02-1.95, p = 0.03 Times respiratory physician explained inhaler technique 0-7 1.1(0.98-1.24, p = 0.1), married status 1.55(0.85-2.82, p = 0.15), hypercholesterolaemia 0.52(0.25-1.01, p = 0.054) and male gender 1.76(0.97-3.18, p = 0.06).

conclusionsKnown predictors of correct pMDI use, such as gender and education level were confirmed, while age and concomitant use of dry powder inhaler were not. Pneumococcal vaccination and awareness of steroid side effects were possible novel positive predictors, while the use of a spacer and co-morbidity with heart disease were found to be negative predictors. Patients' self-assessment correlated well with actual performance. This information may be useful in defining approaches to optimize inhaler techniques which are so susceptible to human error.

Indexed as

Metered Dose InhalersAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAgedAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsChecklistFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMaltaMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdrenal Cortex HormonesBronchodilator AgentsCritical stepHealthcare professionalHuman errorInstructionMedicinal efficacy

Identifiers

PMID28245825
PMCPMC5331728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.