Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28245800›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2017

Gaps and barriers in health-care provision for co-morbid diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study.

C Lo, H Teede, G Fulcher, M Gallagher, P G Kerr, S Ranasinha, G Russell, R Walker, S Zoungas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A codesigned integrated kidney and diabetes model of care improves patient activation among patients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

C LoDiabetes and Vascular Research Program, Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
H TeedeDiabetes and Vascular Research Program, Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
G FulcherDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
M GallagherDepartment of Nephrology, Concord Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia.
P G KerrDepartment of Nephrology, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
S RanasinhaDiabetes and Vascular Research Program, Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
G RussellSchool of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.
R WalkerDepartment of Renal Medicine, Alfred Health, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
S ZoungasDiabetes and Vascular Research Program, Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. sophia.zoungas@monash.edu.
Monash Health · AUMonash University · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AUAlfred Health · AUConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are a complex subset of the growing number of patients with diabetes, due to multi-morbidity. Gaps between recommended and received care for diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are evident despite promulgation of guidelines. Here, we document gaps in tertiary health-care, and the commonest patient-reported barriers to health-care, before exploring the association between these gaps and barriers.

methodsThis cross-sectional study recruited patients with diabetes and CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m

results308 patients, of mean age 66.9 (SD 11.0) years, and mostly male (69.5%) and having type 2 diabetes (88.0%), participated. 49.1% had stage 3, 24.7% stage 4 and 26.3% stage 5 CKD. Gaps between recommended versus received care were evident: 31.9% of patients had an HbA1c ≥ 8%, and 39.3% had a measured blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg. The commonest barriers were poor continuity of care (49.3%), inadequate understanding/education about CKD (43.5%), and feeling unwell (42.6%). However, barriers associated with a failure to receive items of recommended care were inadequate support from family and friends, conflicting advice from and poor communication amongst specialists, the effect of co-morbidities on self-management and feeling unmotivated (all p < 0.05).

conclusionsBarriers to health-care varied across CKD stages and hospitals. Barriers associated with a deviation from recommended care were different for different items of care, suggesting that specific interventions targeting each item of care are required.

Indexed as

AgedAustraliaContinuity of Patient CareCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes ComplicationsFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth LiteracyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionRenal Insufficiency, ChronicBarriersChronic kidney diseaseDiabetesHealth-careMulti-morbidityTertiary health-careTreatment gaps

Identifiers

PMID28245800
PMCPMC5331625
OpenAlexW2592929155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.