Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28245789›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Mechanisms of Groucho-mediated repression revealed by genome-wide analysis of Groucho binding and activity.

Michael Chambers, Wiam Turki-Judeh, Min Woo Kim, Kenny Chen, Sean D Gallaher, Albert J Courey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael ChambersDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Wiam Turki-JudehDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Min Woo KimDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Kenny ChenDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Sean D GallaherDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Albert J CoureyDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. courey@chem.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Repressor/co-repressor oligomerization and developmentR01GM044522 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COUREY, ALBERT J · 1990 to 2011
$4.1M
Transcriptional profiling and annotation of the Chlamydomonas genomeR24GM092473 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MERCHANT, SABEEHA · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044522NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM092473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transcriptional corepressor Groucho (Gro) is required for the function of many developmentally regulated DNA binding repressors, thus helping to define the gene expression profile of each cell during development. The ability of Gro to repress transcription at a distance together with its ability to oligomerize and bind to histones has led to the suggestion that Gro may spread along chromatin. However, much is unknown about the mechanism of Gro-mediated repression and about the dynamics of Gro targeting.

resultsOur chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis of temporally staged Drosophila embryos shows that Gro binds in a highly dynamic manner primarily to clusters of discrete (<1 kb) segments. Consistent with the idea that Gro may facilitate communication between silencers and promoters, Gro binding is enriched at both cis-regulatory modules, as well as within the promotors of potential target genes. While this Gro-recruitment is required for repression, our data show that it is not sufficient for repression. Integration of Gro binding data with transcriptomic analysis suggests that, contrary to what has been observed for another Gro family member, Drosophila Gro is probably a dedicated repressor. This analysis also allows us to define a set of high confidence Gro repression targets. Using publically available data regarding the physical and genetic interactions between these targets, we are able to place them in the regulatory network controlling development. Through analysis of chromatin associated pre-mRNA levels at these targets, we find that genes regulated by Gro in the embryo are enriched for characteristics of promoter proximal paused RNA polymerase II.

conclusionsOur findings are inconsistent with a one-dimensional spreading model for long-range repression and suggest that Gro-mediated repression must be regulated at a post-recruitment step. They also show that Gro is likely a dedicated repressor that sits at a prominent highly interconnected regulatory hub in the developmental network. Furthermore, our findings suggest a role for RNA polymerase II pausing in Gro-mediated repression.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomicsAnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsChromatinDrosophila melanogasterEmbryo, NonmammalianProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsChromatingro protein, DrosophilaRepressor ProteinsChIP-seqChromatin-associated RNA-seq, RNA polymerase II pausingDrosophila embryogenesisGrouchoRNA-seqTranscriptional repression

Identifiers

PMID28245789
PMCPMC5331681
OpenAlexW2594892495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.