Trial reportPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2017
Home-Based Outpatient Telepsychiatry to Improve Adherence With Treatment Appointments: A Pilot Study.
Trial report in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of text message reminders on paediatric appointment adherence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of Telemedicine on Utilization of Psychiatric Resources in New York City during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Community mental health journal · 2024Article
- The effectiveness of telepsychiatry: thematic review.BJPsych bulletin · 2023Review
- Provider perspectives on telemental health implementation: Lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic and paths forward.Psychological services · 2023Article
- Provider perspectives on delivering dialectical behavior therapy via telehealth during COVID-19 in the Department of Veterans Affairs.Psychological services · 2022Article
- Emerging Needs and Viability of Telepsychiatry During and Post COVID-19 Era: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2021Review
- A Narrative Review of Factors Historically Influencing Telehealth Use across Six Medical Specialties in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Survey of CAMHS clinicians about their experience of remote consultation: brief report.BJPsych open · 2021Article
- Experiences of Psychotherapists With Remote Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Provision of Psychotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic among Czech, German and Slovak Psychotherapists.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Telepsychiatry in Psychotherapy Practice.Innovations in clinical neuroscience · 2020Review
- A systematic review of providers' attitudes toward telemental health via videoconferencing.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2020Article
- Recent Advances in Delivering Mental Health Treatment via Video to Home.Current psychiatry reports · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study examined whether patients who had been nonadherent with outpatient appointments and who were randomly assigned to receive treatment through a telepsychiatry intervention (home-based video teleconferencing) would show improvement in adherence to appointments, compared with a treatment-as-usual group.
methodsParticipants (N=22) were randomly assigned to home-based video teleconferencing or to outpatient treatment as usual during a six-month study. The primary outcome measure was improvement in visit adherence, which was analyzed using a two-sample t test.
resultsPercentage improvement in visit adherence did not differ significantly between the telepsychiatry and treatment-as-usual groups (14%, compared with 15%). A greater number of participants in the telepsychiatry group reported less subjective difficulty in keeping appointments.
conclusionsA small number of participants, short study period, selection bias, and the Hawthorne effect may have limited measured impact in this study. The findings implied that visit nonadherence among frequently nonadherent individuals is largely unrelated to inconvenience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.