Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28245229›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Combinatory antibiotic therapy increases rate of bacterial kill but not final outcome in a novel mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus spinal implant infection.

Yan Hu, Vishal Hegde, Daniel Johansen, Amanda H Loftin, Erik Dworsky, Stephen D Zoller, Howard Y Park, Christopher D Hamad, George E Nelson, Kevin P Francis and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Rabbit model ofDisease models & mechanisms · 2020
    Article
  5. In vivo Mouse Model of Spinal Implant Infection.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan HuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Vishal HegdeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6665-0442
Daniel JohansenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Amanda H LoftinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Erik DworskyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Stephen D ZollerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Howard Y ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Christopher D HamadDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
George E NelsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Kevin P FrancisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Anthony ScadutoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
Nicholas M BernthalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, California, United States of America.
University of California, Los Angeles · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Regenerative Musculoskeletal Medicine Training ProgramT32AR059033 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI John S Adams, Nicholas M. Bernthal · 2011 to 2026
$4.8M
Modifying and Delivering Antimicrobials to Prevent Orthopaedic Implant InfectionsK08AR069112 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BERNTHAL, NICHOLAS M. · 2016 to 2019
$704k
NIAMS NIH HHS K08 AR069112NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR059033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of spine implant infections (SII) are challenging. Explantation of infected spinal hardware can destabilize the spine, but retention can lead to cord compromise and biofilm formation, complicating management. While vancomycin monotherapy is commonly used, in vitro studies have shown reduced efficacy against biofilm compared to combination therapy with rifampin. Using an established in vivo mouse model of SII, we aim to evaluate whether combination therapy has increased efficacy compared to both vancomycin alone and infected controls.

methodsAn L-shaped, Kirschner-wire was transfixed into the L4 spinous process of 12-week-old C57BL/6 mice, and inoculated with bioluminescent Staphylococcus aureus. Mice were randomized into a vancomycin group, a combination group with vancomycin plus rifampin, or a control group receiving saline. Treatment began on post-operative day (POD) 7 and continued through POD 14. In vivo imaging was performed to monitor bioluminescence for 35 days. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were cultured on POD 35.

resultsBioluminescence peaked around POD 7 for all groups. The combination group had a 10-fold decrease in signal by POD 10. The vancomycin and control groups reached similar levels on POD 17 and 21, respectively. On POD 25 the combination group dropped below baseline, but rebounded to the same level as the other groups, demonstrating a biofilm-associated infection by POD 35. Quantification of CFUs on POD 35 confirmed an ongoing infection in all three groups.

conclusionsAlthough both therapies were initially effective, they were not able to eliminate implant biofilm bacteria, resulting in a rebound infection after antibiotic cessation. This model shows, for the first time, why histologic-based, static assessments of antimicrobials can be misleading, and the importance of longitudinal tracking of infection. Future studies can use this model to test combinations of antibiotic therapies to see if they are more effective in eliminating biofilm prior to human trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLProstheses and ImplantsSpineStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID28245229
PMCPMC5330510
OpenAlexW2592675861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.