ArticleNature methods2017
Response to: Should we ignore western blots when selecting antibodies for other applications?
Article in Nature methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial resolution of the metastatic osteosarcoma tumor microenvironment using immunolabeling across murine, canine and human lung.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Multifunctional Nanobody Fusion Proteins in Immunoassays: Diverse Strategies for Enhanced Analytical Performance.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2025Article
- Renal autocrine neuropeptide FF (NPFF) signaling regulates blood pressure.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characterization of Antibodies against Receptor Activity-Modifying Protein 1 (RAMP1): A Cautionary Tale.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Calcitonin receptor antibody validation and expression in the rodent brain.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022Article
- Enhanced Validation of Antibodies Enables the Discovery of Missing Proteins.Journal of proteome research · 2020Article
- Antibody validation for Western blot: By the user, for the user.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
- Enhanced validation of antibodies for research applications.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Ten Basic Rules of Antibody Validation.Analytical chemistry insights · 2018Review
- Impact of Etoposide on BRCA1 Expression in Various Breast Cancer Cell Lines.Drugs in R&D · 2017Article
- Proteomic Analysis of Normal and Cancer Cervical Cell Lines Reveals Deregulation of Cytoskeleton-associated Proteins.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28245211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.