Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28244989›Full record

ArticleNature chemical biology2017

A fully automated flow-based approach for accelerated peptide synthesis.

Alexander J Mijalis, Dale A Thomas, Mark D Simon, Andrea Adamo, Ryan Beaumont, Klavs F Jensen, Bradley L Pentelute

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemical biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Backbone Protecting Groups for Enhanced Peptide and Protein Synthesis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander J MijalisDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Dale A ThomasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark D SimonDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrea AdamoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Ryan BeaumontR.M. Beaumont Corporation, Brunswick, Maine, USA.
Klavs F JensenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7192-580X
Bradley L PenteluteDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we report a fully automated, flow-based approach to solid-phase polypeptide synthesis, with amide bond formation in 7 seconds and total synthesis times of 40 seconds per amino acid residue. Crude peptide purities and isolated yields were comparable to those for standard-batch solid-phase peptide synthesis. At full capacity, this approach can yield tens of thousands of individual 30-mer peptides per year.

Indexed as

AutomationPeptidesPeptides

Identifiers

PMID28244989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.