Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28244744›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2017

Land Use Regression Models for Ultrafine Particles in Six European Areas.

Erik van Nunen, Roel Vermeulen, Ming-Yi Tsai, Nicole Probst-Hensch, Alex Ineichen, Mark Davey, Medea Imboden, Regina Ducret-Stich, Alessio Naccarati, Daniela Raffaele and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Erik van NunenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), division of Environmental Epidemiology (EEPI), Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6079-0030
Roel VermeulenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), division of Environmental Epidemiology (EEPI), Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ming-Yi TsaiSwiss Tropical and Public Health (TPH) Institute, University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland.
Nicole Probst-HenschSwiss Tropical and Public Health (TPH) Institute, University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland.
Alex IneichenSwiss Tropical and Public Health (TPH) Institute, University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland.
Mark DaveySwiss Tropical and Public Health (TPH) Institute, University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland.
Medea ImbodenSwiss Tropical and Public Health (TPH) Institute, University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland.
Regina Ducret-StichSwiss Tropical and Public Health (TPH) Institute, University of Basel , Basel, Switzerland.
Alessio NaccaratiHuman Genetics Foundation , Turin, Italy.
Daniela RaffaeleHuman Genetics Foundation , Turin, Italy.
Andrea RanziEnvironmental Health Reference Centre, Regional Agency for Prevention, Environment and Energy of Emilia-Romagna, Modena, Italy.
Cristiana IvaldiARPA Piemonte, Turin, Italy.
Claudia GalassiUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital and Centre for Cancer Prevention, Turin, Italy.
Mark NieuwenhuijsenISGlobal, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain.
Ariadna CurtoISGlobal, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain.
David Donaire-GonzalezISGlobal, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain.
Marta CirachISGlobal, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain.
Leda ChatziInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), division of Environmental Epidemiology (EEPI), Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mariza KampouriDepartment of Social Medicine, University of Crete , Heraklion, Greece.
Jelle VlaanderenInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), division of Environmental Epidemiology (EEPI), Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kees MeliefsteInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), division of Environmental Epidemiology (EEPI), Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Daan BuijtenhuijsInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), division of Environmental Epidemiology (EEPI), Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bert BrunekreefInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), division of Environmental Epidemiology (EEPI), Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands.
David MorleyMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London , St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5092-2762
Paolo VineisHuman Genetics Foundation , Turin, Italy.
John GulliverMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London , St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Gerard HoekInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), division of Environmental Epidemiology (EEPI), Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term ultrafine particle (UFP) exposure estimates at a fine spatial scale are needed for epidemiological studies. Land use regression (LUR) models were developed and evaluated for six European areas based on repeated 30 min monitoring following standardized protocols. In each area; Basel (Switzerland), Heraklion (Greece), Amsterdam, Maastricht, and Utrecht ("The Netherlands"), Norwich (United Kingdom), Sabadell (Spain), and Turin (Italy), 160-240 sites were monitored to develop LUR models by supervised stepwise selection of GIS predictors. For each area and all areas combined, 10 models were developed in stratified random selections of 90% of sites. UFP prediction robustness was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) at 31-50 external sites per area. Models from Basel and The Netherlands were validated against repeated 24 h outdoor measurements. Structure and model R

Indexed as

Air PollutionParticulate MatterAir PollutantsEnvironmental MonitoringModels, TheoreticalAir PollutantsParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID28244744
PMCPMC5362744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.