Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28244143›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2017

Alterations to the Gut Microbiome Impair Bone Strength and Tissue Material Properties.

Jason D Guss, Michael W Horsfield, Fernanda F Fontenele, Taylor N Sandoval, Marysol Luna, Fnu Apoorva, Svetlana F Lima, Rodrigo C Bicalho, Ankur Singh, Ruth E Ley and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Gut microbiome and bone health: update on mechanisms, clinical correlations, and possible treatment strategies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Links between bone fractures and the gut microbiota.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Bone Fragility: Time to Address the Matrix.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Gut microbiome-dependent IL-1 signaling is a mediator of ACVR1bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Gut Microbiota-Mediated Mechanisms of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Obesity Management.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jason D GussSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Michael W HorsfieldSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Fernanda F FonteneleSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Taylor N SandovalSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Marysol LunaSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Fnu ApoorvaSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Svetlana F LimaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Rodrigo C BicalhoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Ankur SinghSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Ruth E LeyDepartment of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Marjolein Ch van der MeulenSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Steven R GoldringHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Christopher J HernandezSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0712-6533

Funding

The microbiome as a risk factor for periprosthetic joint infectionR21AR071534 · NIAMS · HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY · PI BOSTROM, MATHIAS P., HERNANDEZ, CHRISTOPHER JOHN · 2017 to 2018
$431k
Separating Systemic Inflammation From Obesity in Load-Induced OsteoarthritisR21AR068061 · NIAMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI HERNANDEZ, CHRISTOPHER JOHN · 2015 to 2016
$371k
Associations between gut microbiota, flagellin production and bone microstructureF33AR065348 · NIAMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI HERNANDEZ, CHRISTOPHER JOHN · 2013 to 2013
$51k
NIAMS NIH HHS F33 AR065348NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR068061NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR071534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in the gut microbiome have been associated with changes in bone mass and microstructure, but the effects of the microbiome on bone biomechanical properties are not known. Here we examined bone strength under two conditions of altered microbiota: (1) an inbred mouse strain known to develop an altered gut microbiome due to deficits in the immune system (the Toll-like receptor 5-deficient mouse [TLR5KO]); and (2) disruption of the gut microbiota (ΔMicrobiota) through chronic treatment with selected antibiotics (ampicillin and neomycin). The bone phenotypes of TLR5KO and WT (C57Bl/6) mice were examined after disruption of the microbiota from 4 weeks to 16 weeks of age as well as without treatment (n = 7 to 16/group, 39 animals total). Femur bending strength was less in ΔMicrobiota mice than in untreated animals and the reduction in strength was not fully explained by differences in bone cross-sectional geometry, implicating impaired bone tissue material properties. Small differences in whole-bone bending strength were observed between WT and TLR5KO mice after accounting for differences in bone morphology. No differences in trabecular bone volume fraction were associated with genotype or disruption of gut microbiota. Treatment altered the gut microbiota by depleting organisms from the phyla Bacteroidetes and enriching for Proteobacteria, as determined from sequencing of fecal 16S rRNA genes. Differences in splenic immune cell populations were also observed; B and T cell populations were depleted in TLR5KO mice and in ΔMicrobiota mice (p < 0.001), suggesting an association between alterations in bone tissue material properties and immune cell populations. We conclude that alterations in the gut microbiota for extended periods during growth may lead to impaired whole-bone mechanical properties in ways that are not explained by bone geometry. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdipose TissueAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBody WeightBone and BonesBone DensityMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPhenotypeSpleenToll-Like Receptor 5Toll-Like Receptor 5BIOMECHANICSBONE MATRIXOSTEOIMMUNOLOGYOSTEOPOROSIS

Identifiers

PMID28244143
PMCPMC5466506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.