Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28244064›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2017

Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.

Alison McFadden, Anna Gavine, Mary J Renfrew, Angela Wade, Phyll Buchanan, Jane L Taylor, Emma Veitch, Anne Marie Rennie, Susan A Crowther, Sara Neiman and 1 more

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 298 papers, 24 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
298citing papers in PubMed, 24 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03332108 nacompletednot on this map

Novel Approach to Improving Lactation Support Using Mobile Health Technology

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2017 to 2018Enrolled218ConditionsBreastfeeding, Feeding BehaviorArmsEpxBreastfeeding, Baby book survey
NCT04705675 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Breastfeeding Education on Breastfeeding Behavior and the Use of Traditional Practices (An Example From Turkey): A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAysegul DurmazRan2018 to 2018Enrolled304ConditionsBreastfeeding, Breasfeeding Traditional Practices, Post Procedural DischargeArmsBreastfeeding Education
NCT05202002 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Decreasing the Incidence of Post-partum Type II Diabetes Mellitus in Gestational Diabetes Population- Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCarmel Medical CenterRan2021 to 2023Enrolled200ConditionsGestational Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Breastfeeding, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1ArmsVideo clip, No video clip
NCT05350605 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Different Breastfeeding Position Education With Lactation Simulation Model on Breastfeeding

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled105ConditionsBreastfeeding EducationArmsBreastfeeding position education with lactation simulation model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

298 citing papers in PubMed, 24 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

238 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alison McFaddenMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Dundee, 11 Airlie Place, Dundee, Tayside, UK, DD1 4HJ.
Anna Gavineevidence Synthesis Training and Research Group (eSTAR), School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Dundee, 11 Airlie Place, Dundee, UK, DD1 4HJ.
Mary J RenfrewMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Dundee, 11 Airlie Place, Dundee, Tayside, UK, DD1 4HJ.
Angela WadeCentre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford St, London, UK, WC1N 1 EH.
Phyll BuchananBreastfeeding Network, Paisley, Renfrewshire, UK, PA2 8YB.
Jane L TaylorBreastfeeding Network, Paisley, Renfrewshire, UK, PA2 8YB.
Emma VeitchBreastfeeding Network, Paisley, Renfrewshire, UK, PA2 8YB.
Anne Marie RennieNHS Grampian, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZL.
Susan A CrowtherFaculty of Health and Social Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen, UK, AB10 7AQ.
Sara NeimanBreastfeeding Network, Paisley, Renfrewshire, UK, PA2 8YB.
Stephen MacGillivrayevidence Synthesis Training and Research Group (eSTAR), School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Dundee, 11 Airlie Place, Dundee, UK, DD1 4HJ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is extensive evidence of important health risks for infants and mothers related to not breastfeeding. In 2003, the World Health Organization recommended that infants be breastfed exclusively until six months of age, with breastfeeding continuing as an important part of the infant's diet until at least two years of age. However, current breastfeeding rates in many countries do not reflect this recommendation.

objectivesTo describe forms of breastfeeding support which have been evaluated in controlled studies, the timing of the interventions and the settings in which they have been used.To examine the effectiveness of different modes of offering similar supportive interventions (for example, whether the support offered was proactive or reactive, face-to-face or over the telephone), and whether interventions containing both antenatal and postnatal elements were more effective than those taking place in the postnatal period alone.To examine the effectiveness of different care providers and (where information was available) training.To explore the interaction between background breastfeeding rates and effectiveness of support. SEARCH

methodsWe searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (29 February 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing extra support for healthy breastfeeding mothers of healthy term babies with usual maternity care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN

resultsThis updated review includes 100 trials involving more than 83,246 mother-infant pairs of which 73 studies contribute data (58 individually-randomised trials and 15 cluster-randomised trials). We considered that the overall risk of bias of trials included in the review was mixed. Of the 31 new studies included in this update, 21 provided data for one or more of the primary outcomes. The total number of mother-infant pairs in the 73 studies that contributed data to this review is 74,656 (this total was 56,451 in the previous version of this review). The 73 studies were conducted in 29 countries. Results of the analyses continue to confirm that all forms of extra support analyzed together showed a decrease in cessation of 'any breastfeeding', which includes partial and exclusive breastfeeding (average risk ratio (RR) for stopping any breastfeeding before six months 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 0.95; moderate-quality evidence, 51 studies) and for stopping breastfeeding before four to six weeks (average RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.95; moderate-quality evidence, 33 studies). All forms of extra support together also showed a decrease in cessation of exclusive breastfeeding at six months (average RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.92; moderate-quality evidence, 46 studies) and at four to six weeks (average RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.89; moderate quality, 32 studies). We downgraded evidence to moderate-quality due to very high heterogeneity.We investigated substantial heterogeneity for all four outcomes with subgroup analyses for the following covariates: who delivered care, type of support, timing of support, background breastfeeding rate and number of postnatal contacts. Covariates were not able to explain heterogeneity in general. Though the interaction tests were significant for some analyses, we advise caution in the interpretation of results for subgroups due to the heterogeneity. Extra support by both lay and professionals had a positive impact on breastfeeding outcomes. Several factors may have also improved results for women practising exclusive breastfeeding, such as interventions delivered with a face-to-face component, high background initiation rates of breastfeeding, lay support, and a specific schedule of four to eight contacts. However, because within-group heterogeneity remained high for all of these analyses, we advise caution when making specific conclusions based on subgroup results. We noted no evidence for subgroup differences for the any breastfeeding outcomes. AUTHORS'

conclusionsWhen breastfeeding support is offered to women, the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding is increased. Characteristics of effective support include: that it is offered as standard by trained personnel during antenatal or postnatal care, that it includes ongoing scheduled visits so that women can predict when support will be available, and that it is tailored to the setting and the needs of the population group. Support is likely to be more effective in settings with high initiation rates. Support may be offered either by professional or lay/peer supporters, or a combination of both. Strategies that rely mainly on face-to-face support are more likely to succeed with women practising exclusive breastfeeding.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingSocial SupportFemaleHealth EducationHumansInfantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTerm BirthTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28244064
PMCPMC6464485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.