ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2017
Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted with a novel nomogram using clinicopathologic data.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Communicating prognosis to women with early breast cancer - overview of prediction tools and the development and pilot testing of a decision aid.BMC health services research · 2019Pooled it
- Accessible Clinical Tool for Prognosis and Chemotherapy Prediction in Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer in Diverse and Low-Resource Settings.JCO global oncology · 2026Article
- A Simplified Novel Algorithm to Predict the 21-Gene Recurrence Score.World journal of oncology · 2025Article
- Radiomics Analysis of QUS Spectral Parametric Images for Predicting the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence.Cancers · 2025Article
- A scoping review of web-based, interactive, personalized decision-making tools available to support breast cancer treatment and survivorship care.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Oncotype DX recurrence score in node-positive patients in the post-RxPONDER era: a single-institution experience.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Nomogram Development for Assessing Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores in Breast Cancer: A Chinese Population Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a clinical breast cancer tool for accurate prediction of recurrence.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Prediction of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Based on Systematic Evaluation of Ki-67 Scores in Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer.Journal of breast cancer · 2024Article
- The added value of ultrasound imaging biomarkers to clinicopathological factors for the prediction of high-risk Oncotype DX recurrence scores in patients with breast cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Does Pre-Emptive Availability of PREDICT 2.1 Results Change Ordering Practices for Oncotype DX? A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Breast Cancer in Young Women: Is It Different? A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Article
- Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Oncotype DX Risk Group in Patients with ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2023Article
- Prediction of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Using Clinicopathological Variables in Estrogen Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer.Journal of breast cancer · 2023Article
- BCR-Net: A deep learning framework to predict breast cancer recurrence from histopathology images.PloS one · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOncotype DX (ODX) recurrence score (RS) breast cancer (BC) assay is costly, and performed in only ~1/3 of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC patients in the USA. We have now developed a user-friendly nomogram surrogate prediction model for ODX based on a large dataset from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to assist in selecting patients for which further ODX testing may not be necessary and as a surrogate for patients for which ODX testing is not affordable or available.
methodsSix clinicopathologic variables of 27,719 ODX-tested ER+/HER2-/lymph node-negative patients with 6-50 mm tumor size captured by the NCDB from 2010 to 2012 were assessed with logistic regression to predict high-risk or low-risk ODXRS test results with TAILORx-trial and commercial cut-off values; 12,763 ODX-tested patients in 2013 were used for external validation. The predictive accuracy of the regression model was yielded using a Receiver Operator Characteristic analysis. Model fit was analyzed by plotting the predicted probabilities against the actual probabilities. A user-friendly calculator version of nomograms is available online at the University of Tennessee Medical Center website (Knoxville, TN).
resultsGrade and progesterone receptor status were the highest predictors of both low-risk and high-risk ODXRS, followed by age, tumor size, histologic tumor type and lymph-vascular invasion (C-indexes-.0.85 vs. 0.88 for TAILORx-trial vs. commercial cut-off values, respectively).
conclusionThis is the first study of this scale showing confidently that clinicopathologic variables can be used for prediction of low-risk or high-risk ODXRS using our nomogram models. These novel nomograms will be useful tools to help physicians and patients decide whether further ODX testing is necessary and are excellent surrogates for patients for which ODX testing is not affordable or available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.