Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28243897›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2017

Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted with a novel nomogram using clinicopathologic data.

Amila Orucevic, John L Bell, Alison P McNabb, Robert E Heidel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amila OrucevicDepartment of Pathology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Hwy, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA. aorucevic@utmck.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4183-8980
John L BellDepartment of Surgery, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Hwy, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.
Alison P McNabbGraduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Hwy, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.
Robert E HeidelDepartment of Surgery, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Hwy, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOncotype DX (ODX) recurrence score (RS) breast cancer (BC) assay is costly, and performed in only ~1/3 of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC patients in the USA. We have now developed a user-friendly nomogram surrogate prediction model for ODX based on a large dataset from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to assist in selecting patients for which further ODX testing may not be necessary and as a surrogate for patients for which ODX testing is not affordable or available.

methodsSix clinicopathologic variables of 27,719 ODX-tested ER+/HER2-/lymph node-negative patients with 6-50 mm tumor size captured by the NCDB from 2010 to 2012 were assessed with logistic regression to predict high-risk or low-risk ODXRS test results with TAILORx-trial and commercial cut-off values; 12,763 ODX-tested patients in 2013 were used for external validation. The predictive accuracy of the regression model was yielded using a Receiver Operator Characteristic analysis. Model fit was analyzed by plotting the predicted probabilities against the actual probabilities. A user-friendly calculator version of nomograms is available online at the University of Tennessee Medical Center website (Knoxville, TN).

resultsGrade and progesterone receptor status were the highest predictors of both low-risk and high-risk ODXRS, followed by age, tumor size, histologic tumor type and lymph-vascular invasion (C-indexes-.0.85 vs. 0.88 for TAILORx-trial vs. commercial cut-off values, respectively).

conclusionThis is the first study of this scale showing confidently that clinicopathologic variables can be used for prediction of low-risk or high-risk ODXRS using our nomogram models. These novel nomograms will be useful tools to help physicians and patients decide whether further ODX testing is necessary and are excellent surrogates for patients for which ODX testing is not affordable or available.

Indexed as

NomogramsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, ProgesteroneROC CurveTumor BurdenYoung AdultReceptors, ProgesteroneClinicopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX scoreNomograms predicting Oncotype DX resultsOncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score

Identifiers

PMID28243897
PMCPMC5387031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.