Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28243723›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2017

Photobiomodulation therapy for the management of radiation-induced dermatitis : A single-institution experience of adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery.

Iosif Strouthos, Georgios Chatzikonstantinou, Nikolaos Tselis, Dimitra Bon, Efstratios Karagiannis, Eleni Zoga, Konstantinos Ferentinos, Julia Maximenko, Vassiliki Nikolettou-Fischer, Nikolaos Zamboglou

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Is photobiomodulation therapy effective in reducing pain caused by toxicities related to head and neck cancer treatment? A systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Biophysical skin measurements to evaluate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy in the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Photobiomodulation therapy for mitigating severity of radiodermatitis in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Photobiomodulation and Cancer: What Is the Truth?Photomedicine and laser surgery · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Iosif StrouthosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany. iosif.strouthos@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6229-5471
Georgios ChatzikonstantinouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
Nikolaos TselisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
Dimitra BonInstitute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, J. W. Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Efstratios KaragiannisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
Eleni ZogaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
Konstantinos FerentinosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
Julia MaximenkoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
Vassiliki Nikolettou-FischerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
Nikolaos ZamboglouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
Sana Klinikum Offenbach · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiation therapy (RT) comprises a key component in the treatment of breast cancer. Radiation-induced skin toxicity is the major adverse event experienced by patients; however, radiodermatitis (RD) prevention and management remains trivial. It is proven that photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy using light-emitting diode (LED) increases wound healing and depicts an anti-inflammatory effect. This single-institute study evaluates the beneficial role of PBM-LED in preventing/reducing RD during breast cancer RT. PATIENTS AND

methodsOf 70 consecutively treated patients, 25 patients were treated with PBM-LED twice a week prior to adjuvant 3D conformal RT after breast-conserving surgery. RD was reported using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 and pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS). For comparison, a control group (n = 45) received RT without PBM-LED. In addition, a "matched" group (n = 25) was generated from the control group based on propensity for potentially confounding variables.

resultsIn the PBM group, 22 patients (88%) presented grade 1 and 3 (12%) grade 2 RD. In the control group, 25 patients (55.6%) developed grade 1 reactions, 18 patients (40%) grade 2, and 2 (4.4%) patients grade 3 RD. Concerning pain intensity, 15 patients (60%) of the PBM treatment arm reported no pain, 5 patients (20%) VAS 2, and 5 (20%) VAS 3. In the control group, 13 patients (28.9%) reported no pain, 2 (4.4%) VAS 1, 7 (15.6%) VAS 2, 9 patients (20%) reported VAS 3, 12 (26.7%) patients VAS 4, and 2 (4.4%) patients VAS 5.

conclusionPBM-LED therapy applied prior to RT might be effective in decreasing the incidence and sequelae of radiation-induced skin toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, SegmentalRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRadiotherapy, ConformalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLow-Level Light TherapyMiddle AgedRadiodermatitisTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerLight-emitting diode (LED)PhotobiomodulationRadiation therapyRadiodermatitis

Identifiers

PMID28243723
OpenAlexW2594216455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.