Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28243543›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Development and validation of a 36-gene sequencing assay for hereditary cancer risk assessment.

Valentina S Vysotskaia, Gregory J Hogan, Genevieve M Gould, Xin Wang, Alex D Robertson, Kevin R Haas, Mark R Theilmann, Lindsay Spurka, Peter V Grauman, Henry H Lai and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inherited Cancer in the Age of Next-Generation Sequencing.Biological research for nursing · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina S Vysotskaia *Research and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Gregory J Hogan *Research and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Genevieve M Gould *Research and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Xin WangResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Alex D RobertsonResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Kevin R HaasResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Mark R TheilmannResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Lindsay SpurkaResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Peter V GraumanResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Henry H LaiResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Diana JeonResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Genevieve HaliburtonResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Matt LeggettProject Management Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Clement S ChuResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Kevin IoriResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Jared R MaguireResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Kaylene ReadyMedical Affairs Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Eric A EvansResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Hyunseok P KangClinical Laboratory, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, California, United States.
Imran S HaqueResearch and Development Department, Counsyl, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Color (United States) · USFreenome (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past two decades have brought many important advances in our understanding of the hereditary susceptibility to cancer. Numerous studies have provided convincing evidence that identification of germline mutations associated with hereditary cancer syndromes can lead to reductions in morbidity and mortality through targeted risk management options. Additionally, advances in gene sequencing technology now permit the development of multigene hereditary cancer testing panels. Here, we describe the 2016 revision of the Counsyl Inherited Cancer Screen for detecting single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), short insertions and deletions (indels), and copy number variants (CNVs) in 36 genes associated with an elevated risk for breast, ovarian, colorectal, gastric, endometrial, pancreatic, thyroid, prostate, melanoma, and neuroendocrine cancers. To determine test accuracy and reproducibility, we performed a rigorous analytical validation across 341 samples, including 118 cell lines and 223 patient samples. The screen achieved 100% test sensitivity across different mutation types, with high specificity and 100% concordance with conventional Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). We also demonstrated the screen's high intra-run and inter-run reproducibility and robust performance on blood and saliva specimens. Furthermore, we showed that pathogenic Alu element insertions can be accurately detected by our test. Overall, the validation in our clinical laboratory demonstrated the analytical performance required for collecting and reporting genetic information related to risk of developing hereditary cancers.

Indexed as

Analytical validationHereditary cancerMultigene panel testingNext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28243543
PMCPMC5326550
OpenAlexW2952777088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.