Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28243528›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Counting complete? Finalising the plant inventory of a global biodiversity hotspot.

Martina Treurnicht, Jonathan F Colville, Lucas N Joppa, Onno Huyser, John Manning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martina TreurnichtDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa; Institute of Landscape and Plant Ecology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; South African Environmental Observation Network Fynbos Node, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Jonathan F ColvilleKirstenbosch Research Centre, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; Statistics in Ecology, Environment and Conservation, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Lucas N JoppaMicrosoft Research , Redmond , WA , United States of America.
Onno HuyserCentre for Biodiversity Conservation, Kirstenbosch Botanical Gardens, Table Mountain Fund (WWF-SA) , Cape Town , Western Cape , South Africa.
John ManningCompton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa; Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cape Floristic Region-the world's smallest and third richest botanical hotspot-has benefited from sustained levels of taxonomic effort and exploration for almost three centuries, but how close is this to resulting in a near-complete plant species inventory? We analyse a core component of this flora over a 250-year period for trends in taxonomic effort and species discovery linked to ecological and conservation attributes. We show that >40% of the current total of species was described within the first 100 years of exploration, followed by a continued steady rate of description. We propose that <1% of the flora is still to be described. We document a relatively constant cohort of taxonomists, working over 250 years at what we interpret to be their 'taxonomic maximum.' Rates of description of new species were independent of plant growth-form but narrow-range taxa have constituted a significantly greater proportion of species discoveries since 1950. This suggests that the fraction of undiscovered species predominantly comprises localised endemics that are thus of high conservation concern. Our analysis provides important real-world insights for other hotspots in the context of global strategic plans for biodiversity in informing considerations of the likely effort required in attaining set targets of comprehensive plant inventories. In a time of unprecedented biodiversity loss, we argue for a focused research agenda across disciplines to increase the rate of species descriptions in global biodiversity hotspots.

Indexed as

Bio-inventoryBotanical explorationCape Floristic RegionPlant conservationPlant species descriptionSpecies accumulationSpecies discoverySpecies inventoryTaxonomic effort

Identifiers

PMID28243528
PMCPMC5322757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.