Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28243157›Full record

ArticleNature and science of sleep2017

Big data in sleep medicine: prospects and pitfalls in phenotyping.

Matt T Bianchi, Kathryn Russo, Harriett Gabbidon, Tiaundra Smith, Balaji Goparaju, M Brandon Westover

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. SleepOMICS: How Big Data Can Revolutionize Sleep Science.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
  7. Change is the Only Constant in Life (and in Sleep Medicine).Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Personalised medicine in sleep respiratory disorders: focus on obstructive sleep apnoea diagnosis and treatment.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matt T BianchiNeurology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital; Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kathryn RussoNeurology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Harriett GabbidonNeurology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Tiaundra SmithNeurology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Balaji GoparajuNeurology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital.
M Brandon WestoverNeurology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Funding

Quantitative Monitoring and Control of Sedation and Pain in the ICU EnvironmentK23NS090900 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WESTOVER, MICHAEL BRANDON · 2014 to 2018
$988k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS090900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical polysomnography (PSG) databases are a rich resource in the era of "big data" analytics. We explore the uses and potential pitfalls of clinical data mining of PSG using statistical principles and analysis of clinical data from our sleep center. We performed retrospective analysis of self-reported and objective PSG data from adults who underwent overnight PSG (diagnostic tests, n=1835). Self-reported symptoms overlapped markedly between the two most common categories, insomnia and sleep apnea, with the majority reporting symptoms of both disorders. Standard clinical metrics routinely reported on objective data were analyzed for basic properties (missing values, distributions), pairwise correlations, and descriptive phenotyping. Of 41 continuous variables, including clinical and PSG derived, none passed testing for normality. Objective findings of sleep apnea and periodic limb movements were common, with 51% having an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) >5 per hour and 25% having a leg movement index >15 per hour. Different visualization methods are shown for common variables to explore population distributions. Phenotyping methods based on clinical databases are discussed for sleep architecture, sleep apnea, and insomnia. Inferential pitfalls are discussed using the current dataset and case examples from the literature. The increasing availability of clinical databases for large-scale analytics holds important promise in sleep medicine, especially as it becomes increasingly important to demonstrate the utility of clinical testing methods in management of sleep disorders. Awareness of the strengths, as well as caution regarding the limitations, will maximize the productive use of big data analytics in sleep medicine.

Indexed as

correlationplottingpolysomnographysleep disordersstatisticssubjective symptoms

Identifiers

PMID28243157
PMCPMC5317347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.