Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28243058›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2017

Effects of 3% trehalose as an adjuvant treatment after LASIK.

Antonio J Mateo Orobia, Paula Casas Pascual, José Á Cristóbal Bescós, Diana Perez García, Carlos Peiro Embid, M Ángeles Del Buey Sayas, Valentyna Korobko Kulikova, Noelia Lafuente Ojeda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Commercially Available Eye Drops Containing Trehalose Protect Against Dry Conditions via Autophagy Induction.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio J Mateo OrobiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Quirón; Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS).
Paula Casas PascualDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Quirón; Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano-Blesa.
José Á Cristóbal BescósDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Quirón.
Diana Perez GarcíaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Quirón; Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano-Blesa.
Carlos Peiro EmbidDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Quirón; Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano-Blesa.
M Ángeles Del Buey SayasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Quirón; Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano-Blesa.
Valentyna Korobko KulikovaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Quirón.
Noelia Lafuente OjedaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa · ESBoiron (France) · FRHospital Quirónsalud Barcelona · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effect of 3% trehalose as an adjuvant in the standard treatment after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

designInterventional prospective comparative single-blind study.

settingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Quirón Zaragoza, Spain.

methodsA total of 26 eyes (13 patients) were included, of which 12 eyes (group 1) received conventional treatment with lubricant drops of hyaluronic acid (0.15%) and 14 eyes (group 2) received, additionally, an ophthalmic solution of 3% trehalose. Pre- and postoperative quality-of-life tests and vital stains, tear breakup time, and osmolarity measurements were made.

resultsWe obtained statistically significant differences between the groups in the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye test in all visits with respect to severity, and in the postoperative day 1 visit with respect to frequency, in all cases favoring the trehalose treatment. The values of osmolarity were not significantly different between groups. However, we did find significant differences in the Oxford scale in day 90 for the trehalose treatment (

conclusionThe results of this exploratory study indicate that the adjuvant treatment with 3% trehalose could be superior with respect to the standard treatment, with improvements in the objective and subjective parameters of tear quality.

Indexed as

dry eye syndromehyaluronic acidLASIKosmolaritytrehalose

Identifiers

PMID28243058
PMCPMC5317334
OpenAlexW2588924353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.