Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28242866›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor basic research2017

Cross-Over Study Comparing Postprandial Glycemic Increase After Addition of a Fixed-Dose Mitiglinide/Voglibose Combination or a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor to Basal Insulin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Noriko Ihana-Sugiyama, Ritsuko Yamamoto-Honda, Takehiro Sugiyama, Tetsuro Tsujimoto, Masafumi Kakei, Mitsuhiko Noda

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor basic research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noriko Ihana-SugiyamaDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Center for Global Health and Medicine Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ritsuko Yamamoto-HondaDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Center for Global Health and Medicine Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takehiro SugiyamaDepartment of Clinical Study and Informatics, Center for Clinical Sciences National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuro TsujimotoDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Center for Global Health and Medicine Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masafumi KakeiSaitama Citizens Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Mitsuhiko NodaDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
National Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPHiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although the efficacy of combination therapy consisting of basal insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) has been shown, which OHAs are the most efficient remains unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS Five patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled and treated with insulin degludec and metformin as a basal therapy. The patients were randomized in a cross-over fashion to receive a combination of mitiglinide (10 mg) and voglibose (0.2 mg) (M+V) 3 times daily or linagliptin (5 mg) (L) once daily for 8 weeks. After 8 weeks, 2 kinds of meal tolerance tests were performed as breakfast on 2 consecutive days. The first breakfast contained 460 kcal (carbohydrates, 49.1%; protein, 15.7%; fat, 35.2%), while the second contained 462 kcal (carbohydrates, 37.2%; protein, 19.6%; fat, 43.2%). Self-monitoring blood glucose levels were measured at 0, 30, 60, and 120 min after the meal tests, and the increase in the postprandial area under the curve (AUC)0-120 min was determined. The HbA1c, glycated albumin, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (AG) levels were measured, and continuous glucose monitoring was performed. RESULTS The increase in the postprandial AUC0-120 min was significantly smaller in the M+V group than in the L group after both meals. The 24-h average, 24-h standard deviations, 24-h AUC, and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) were similar for both groups and after both meals. The change in 1,5-AG was higher in the M+V group than in the L group. CONCLUSIONS The combination of M+V with basal therapy improved postprandial glucose excursion more effectively than L in T2DM patients.

Indexed as

AgedBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-PeptidasesHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInositolInsulinInsulin, Long-ActingIsoindolesLinagliptinMaleMetforminMiddle AgedPostprandial PeriodBlood GlucoseDipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-PeptidasesHypoglycemic AgentsInositolInsulininsulin degludecInsulin, Long-ActingIsoindolesLinagliptinMetforminmitiglinidevoglibose

Identifiers

PMID28242866
PMCPMC5345383
OpenAlexW2592842510

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.