Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28242738›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Neuronal control of fixation and fixational eye movements.

Richard J Krauzlis, Laurent Goffart, Ziad M Hafed

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 229 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Loss of neuronal population organization links pathology to behavior in a model of Alzheimer's disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chronic sleep restriction induces oculomotor impairment with inadequate compensation.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Richard J KrauzlisLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA richard.krauzlis@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1826-0447
Laurent GoffartCNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, UMR 7289 Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8767-1867
Ziad M HafedWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9968-119X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRNational Eye Institute · USSenckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment · DE

Funding

Visual CircuitsZIAEY000511 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI KRAUZLIS, RICHARD · 2012 to 2025
$28.3M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular fixation is a dynamic process that is actively controlled by many of the same brain structures involved in the control of eye movements, including the superior colliculus, cerebellum and reticular formation. In this article, we review several aspects of this active control. First, the decision to move the eyes not only depends on target-related signals from the peripheral visual field, but also on signals from the currently fixated target at the fovea, and involves mechanisms that are shared between saccades and smooth pursuit. Second, eye position during fixation is actively controlled and depends on bilateral activity in the superior colliculi and medio-posterior cerebellum; disruption of activity in these circuits causes systematic deviations in eye position during both fixation and smooth pursuit eye movements. Third, the eyes are not completely still during fixation but make continuous miniature movements, including ocular drift and microsaccades, which are controlled by the same neuronal mechanisms that generate larger saccades. Finally, fixational eye movements have large effects on visual perception. Ocular drift transforms the visual input in ways that increase spatial acuity; microsaccades not only improve vision by relocating the fovea but also cause momentary changes in vision analogous to those caused by larger saccades.This article is part of the themed issue 'Movement suppression: brain mechanisms for stopping and stillness'.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularSaccadesVisual PerceptionAnimalsCerebellumHaplorhiniHumansReticular FormationSuperior Colliculieye movementsfixationmicrosaccadepursuitsaccadesuperior colliculus

Identifiers

PMID28242738
PMCPMC5332863
OpenAlexW2593801862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.