Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28242734›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Stopping smooth pursuit.

Marcus Missal, Stephen J Heinen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Eye Movements Decrease during Effortful Speech Listening.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Subconscious Interaction between Fixation and Anticipatory Pursuit.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  11. Models of inhibitory control.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  12. Neuronal control of fixation and fixational eye movements.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcus MissalInstitute of Neuroscience (IONS), Cognition and Systems (COSY), Université catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium marcus.missal@uclouvain.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0157-8694
Stephen J HeinenSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.

Funding

Attention Allocation for Voluntary Smooth Eye MovementsR01EY021286 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HEINEN, STEPHEN J · 2012 to 2014
$974k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If a visual object of interest suddenly starts to move, we will try to follow it with a smooth movement of the eyes. This

Indexed as

Pursuit, SmoothVisual PerceptionAnimalsBrain StemHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMacaca mulattaNeuronsinhibitionomnipause neuronspredictionsmooth pursuitsupplementary eye fields

Identifiers

PMID28242734
PMCPMC5332859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.