ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017
Abandoning and modifying one action plan for alternatives.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Goal-directed action modulates audiovisual multisensory perception.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Emergent motor timing enhances time perception.iScience · 2025Article
- Reaching the cognitive-motor interface: effects of cognitive load on arm choice and motor performance after stroke.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Mechanisms and neuroanatomy of response selection in tool and non-tool action tasks: Evidence from left-hemisphere stroke.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023Article
- Continuous action with a neurobiologically inspired computational approach reveals the dynamics of selection history.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Rethinking Vision and Action.Annual review of psychology · 2023Review
- Reciprocal facilitation between mental and visuomotor rotations.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Modulation of visually guided action by the image and familiar sizes of real-world objects.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Revealing the effects of temporal orienting of attention on response conflict using continuous movements.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- Neural Encoding and Representation of Time for Sensorimotor Control and Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Review
- Reaching movements are attracted by stimuli that signal reward.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020Article
- The attractiveness of salient distractors to reaching movements is task dependent.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020Article
- Lost to translation: How design factors of the mouse-tracking procedure impact the inference from action to cognition.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2019Article
- The spatial dynamics of mouse-tracking reveal that attention capture is stimulus-driven rather than contingent upon top-down goals.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2019Article
- Corrective response times in a coordinated eye-head-arm countermanding task.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Not moving: the fundamental but neglected motor function.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Visual scenes are often complex and crowded with many different objects. To interact effectively, we must choose one object at a time as a goal for action. Certain
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.