ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017
Models of inhibitory control.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The influence of emotional stimuli on response inhibition: a systematic review in non-clinical adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Stimulation success!? Improved response inhibition performance after prefrontal single-site and condition-and-perturb transcranial magnetic stimulation.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Association Between Regular Physical Activity and Food-Specific Inhibitory Control in Young Chinese Adults: An fMRI Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Spatial and Temporal Factors Influencing Fixational Saccades.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Bringing Executive Function Testing Online: Assessment Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Article
- Computational mechanism underlying switching of motor actions.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- General mechanisms of task engagement in the primate frontal cortex.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Towards Dependent Race Models for the Stop-Signal Paradigm: The Copula Approach.Computational brain & behavior · 2024Article
- Response stopping under conflict: The integrative role of representational dynamics associated with the insular cortex.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Beneficial effects of mindfulness-based intervention on hippocampal volumes and episodic memory for childhood adversity survivors.Journal of affective disorders reports · 2024Article
- Motivational context and neurocomputation of stop expectation moderate early attention responses supporting proactive inhibitory control.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Response inhibition in premotor cortex corresponds to a complex reshuffle of the mesoscopic information network.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Investigating the role of contextual cues and interhemispheric inhibitory mechanisms in response-selective stopping: a TMS study.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- Restart errors reaction time of a two-step inhibition process account for the violation of the race model's independence in multi-effector selective stop signal task.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- The role of visual association cortices during response selection processes in interference-modulated response stopping.Cerebral cortex communications · 2023Article
- Individual differences in beta-band oscillations predict motor-inhibitory control.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Reward prospect affects strategic adjustments in stop signal task.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Towards Conceptual Clarification of Proactive Inhibitory Control: A Review.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Neuronal population dynamics during motor plan cancellation in nonhuman primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We survey models of response inhibition having different degrees of mathematical, computational and neurobiological specificity and generality. The independent race model accounts for performance of the stop-signal or countermanding task in terms of a race between GO and STOP processes with stochastic finishing times. This model affords insights into neurophysiological mechanisms that are reviewed by other authors in this volume. The formal link between the abstract GO and STOP processes and instantiating neural processes is articulated through interactive race models consisting of stochastic accumulator GO and STOP units. This class of model provides quantitative accounts of countermanding performance and replicates the dynamics of neural activity producing that performance. The interactive race can be instantiated in a network of biophysically plausible spiking excitatory and inhibitory units. Other models seek to account for interactions between units in frontal cortex, basal ganglia and superior colliculus. The strengths, weaknesses and relationships of the different models will be considered. We will conclude with a brief survey of alternative modelling approaches and a summary of problems to be addressed including accounting for differences across effectors, species, individuals, task conditions and clinical deficits.This article is part of the themed issue 'Movement suppression: brain mechanisms for stopping and stillness'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.