Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28242592›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Perceptions of Menthol Cigarettes Among Twitter Users: Content and Sentiment Analysis.

Shyanika W Rose, Catherine L Jo, Steven Binns, Melissa Buenger, Sherry Emery, Kurt M Ribisl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Analysis of Twitter Posts About the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Menthol Ban.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Valence of Media Coverage About Electronic Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products From 2014 to 2017: Evidence From Automated Content Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shyanika W RoseThe Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4200-1197
Catherine L JoDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8706-9523
Steven BinnsHealth Media Collaboratory, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8573-107X
Melissa BuengerHealth Media Collaboratory, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8323-1749
Sherry EmeryHealth Media Collaboratory, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Kurt M RibislDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3318-8524
University of Chicago · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USAmerican Legacy Foundation · US

Funding

Tobacco Control in a Rapidly Changing Media EnvironmentU01CA154254 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI EMERY, SHERRY L · 2011 to 2015
$7.7M
The Effect of E-Cigarette Print Advertisements on Smoking CessationF31DA039609 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JO, CATHERINE · 2015 to 2016
$54k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154254NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA039609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMenthol cigarettes are used disproportionately by African American, female, and adolescent smokers. Twitter is also used disproportionately by minority and younger populations, providing a unique window into conversations reflecting social norms, behavioral intentions, and sentiment toward menthol cigarettes.

objectiveOur purpose was to identify the content and frequency of conversations about menthol cigarettes, including themes, populations, user smoking status, other tobacco or substances, tweet characteristics, and sentiment. We also examined differences in menthol cigarette sentiment by prevalent categories, which allowed us to assess potential perceptions, misperceptions, and social norms about menthol cigarettes on Twitter. This approach can inform communication about these products, particularly to subgroups who are at risk for menthol cigarette use.

methodsThrough a combination of human and machine classification, we identified 94,627 menthol cigarette-relevant tweets from February 1, 2012 to January 31, 2013 (1 year) from over 47 million tobacco-related messages gathered prospectively from the Twitter Firehose of all public tweets and metadata. Then, 4 human coders evaluated a random sample of 7000 tweets for categories, including sentiment toward menthol cigarettes.

resultsWe found that 47.98% (3194/6657) of tweets expressed positive sentiment, while 40.26% (2680/6657) were negative toward menthol cigarettes. The majority of tweets by likely smokers (2653/4038, 65.70%) expressed positive sentiment, while 91.2% (320/351) of nonsmokers and 71.7% (91/127) of former smokers indicated negative views. Positive views toward menthol cigarettes were predominant in tweets that discussed addiction or craving, marijuana, smoking, taste or sensation, song lyrics, and tobacco industry or marketing or tweets that were commercial in nature. Negative views toward menthol were more common in tweets about smoking cessation, health, African Americans, women, and children and adolescents-largely due to expression of negative stereotypes associated with these groups' use of menthol cigarettes.

conclusionsExaminations of public opinions toward menthol cigarettes through social media can help to inform the framing of public communication about menthol cigarettes, particularly in light of potential regulation by the European Union, US Food and Drug Administration, other jurisdictions, and localities.

Indexed as

MentholSocial MediaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansPerceptionPublic OpinionSmokingMentholmentholpolicypublic opinionsmokingsocial mediatobacco productsTwitter messaging

Identifiers

PMID28242592
PMCPMC5348619
OpenAlexW2592794011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.