Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28242317›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2018

Studying brain microstructure with magnetic susceptibility contrast at high-field.

Jeff H Duyn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Magnetic resonance imaging.Science advances · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Photoacoustics · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Real-time shimming with FID navigators.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeff H DuynAdvanced MRI Section, Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Brain Anatomy and FunctionZIANS003027 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI DUYN, JEFF · 2009 to 2025
$31.2M
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Brain Anatomy and FunctionZ01NS003027 · NINDS · NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI DUYN, JOZEF H · 2007 to 2008
$2.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 NS003027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rapidly developing application of high field MRI is the study of brain anatomy and function with contrast based on the magnetic susceptibility of tissues. To study the subtle variations in susceptibility contrast between tissues and with changes in brain activity, dedicated scan techniques such as susceptibility-weighted MRI and blood-oxygen level dependent functional MRI have been developed. Particularly strong susceptibility contrast has been observed with systems that operate at 7T and above, and their recent widespread use has led to an improved understanding of contributing sources and mechanisms. To interpret magnetic susceptibility contrast, analysis approaches have been developed with the goal of extracting measures that report on local tissue magnetic susceptibility, a physical quantity that, under certain conditions, allows estimation of blood oxygenation, local tissue iron content, and quantification of its changes with disease. Interestingly, high field studies have also brought to light that not only the makeup of tissues affects MRI susceptibility contrast, but that also a tissue's sub-voxel structure at scales all the way down to the molecular level plays an important role as well. In this review, various ways will be discussed by which sub-voxel structure can affect the MRI signal in general, and magnetic susceptibility in particular, sometimes in a complex fashion. In the light of this complexity, it appears likely that accurate, brain-wide quantification of iron will require the combination of multiple contrasts that may include diffusion and magnetization transfer information with susceptibility-weighted contrast. On the other hand, this complexity also offers opportunities to use magnetic susceptibility contrast to inform about specific microstructural aspects of brain tissue. Details and several examples will be presented in this review.

Indexed as

FerritinsMagnetic PhenomenaNerve Fibers, MyelinatedCerebral CortexHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingWhite MatterFerritinsAnatomyBrainIronMagnetic susceptibilityMicrostructureMRIMyelin

Identifiers

PMID28242317
PMCPMC5569005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.