Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28242311›Full record

ArticleAppetite2017

Taste assessment in normal weight and overweight individuals with co-occurring Binge Eating Disorder.

Jean M Arlt, Gregory S Smutzer, Eunice Y Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05772052 (Food Addiction, Binge Eating Disorder and Taste Perception in Subjects With Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05772052 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Food Addiction, Binge Eating Disorder and Taste Perception in Subjects With Obesity

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituto Auxologico ItalianoRan2020 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsObesity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Variations in basic taste perception and body mass index.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean M ArltTemple Eating Disorders Program, Department of Clinical Psychology, Temple University, 1701 North 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA. Electronic address: tuf22572@temple.edu.
Gregory S SmutzerDepartment of Biology, Temple University, 1900 North 12th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Eunice Y ChenTemple Eating Disorders Program, Department of Clinical Psychology, Temple University, 1701 North 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Temple University · US

Funding

The Reward Neurocircuitry and Binge-Eating Disorder and Obesity - a Pilot StudyR21MH093932 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI CHEN, EUNICE YU · 2012 to 2013
$406k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH093932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTaste perception influences food choice, and may contribute to both weight status and disordered eating. Relatively little work has attempted to disentangle contributions of weight status and Binge Eating Disorder (BED) to human taste perception. We predicted weight status and BED would interact, showing difference in taste perception from non-eating disorder matched groups.

methodsThe four study groups included: normal weight BED (NW BED), normal weight healthy controls (NW HC), overweight BED (OW BED), and overweight healthy controls (OW HC) (N = 60). Groups were matched for age (±5 years), ethnicity, and weight status. Participants were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, the Eating Disorder Examination Version 16.0, and the NIH Toolbox Gustatory Assessment with additional taste solutions and taste stimulus delivered with edible taste strips.

resultsInteractions were found between weight status and diagnosis on measures of regional taste intensity for quinine hydrochloride (CI 95% [44.61, 56.31], p = 0.018), sucrose (CI 95% [46.79, 56.45], p = 0.003), and 6-n-propylthiouracil (CI 95% [25.557, 39.269], p = 0.015). OW BED participants perceived these taste stimuli significantly less intensely than OW HC and NW BED. Whole mouth taste intensity tests at suprathreshold amounts did not reveal group differences. All four groups reported similar hedonic response to taste stimuli. Edible taste strips had medium to large significant correlations with NIH Gustatory Assessment taste stimuli.

conclusionsThere were significant differences in the taste perception of OW BED relative to the other three groups. These findings may provide partial explanation as to why previous studies correlating taste and weight status have mixed results. Replication in larger samples assessed longitudinally is needed to extend this work.

Indexed as

Taste PerceptionTaste ThresholdAdolescentAdultBinge-Eating DisorderBody WeightCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOverweightYoung AdultBinge Eating DisorderNIH Gustatory AssessmentObesityTaste sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID28242311
PMCPMC5670743
OpenAlexW2589311310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.