Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28241908›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2017

Implementation and Evaluation of the Safety Net Specialty Care Program in the Denver Metropolitan Area.

Meredith P Fort, Lynnette M Namba, Sarah Dutcher, Tracy Copeland, Neysa Bermingham, Chris Fellenz, Deborah Lantz, John J Reusch, Elizabeth A Bayliss

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Electronic consultations (E-consults) and their outcomes: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meredith P FortResearch Assistant Professor in the Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy and the Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health at the University of Colorado Denver in Aurora. meredith.fort@ucdenver.edu.
Lynnette M NambaSenior Community Health Specialist in the Community Benefit and Relations Department at Kaiser Permanente Colorado in Denver. lynnette.m.namba@kp.org.
Sarah DutcherCommunity Health Center Advocate and a former Senior Manager in the Quality Initiatives Division of the Colorado Community Health Network in Denver. sdutcher@kentdenver.org.
Tracy CopelandProject Coordinator for Community Care in the Community Benefit and Relations Department at Kaiser Permanente Colorado in Denver. tracy.s.copeland@kp.org.
Neysa BerminghamFormer Access to Care Manager in the Community Benefit and Relations Department at Kaiser Permanente Colorado in Denver. neysawb@yahoo.com.
Chris FellenzPhysician Lead for Safety Net Partnerships and Access to Care in the Community Benefit and Relations Department at Kaiser Permanente Colorado in Denver. christopher.j.fellenz@kp.org.
Deborah LantzClinical Services Director for the Department of Neurology and Community Patient Access for Kaiser Permanente Colorado in Denver. deborah.j.lantz@kp.org.
John J ReuschCardiologist with the Colorado Permanente Medical Group in Denver. john.j.reusch@kp.org.
Elizabeth A BaylissClinician Investigator for the Institute for Health Research of Kaiser Permanente Colorado in Denver and a Professor of Family Medicine at the University of Colorado School of Medicine. elizabeth.bayliss@kp.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn response to limited access to specialty care in safety-net settings, an integrated delivery system and three safety-net organizations in the Denver, CO, metropolitan area launched a unique program in 2013. The program offers safety-net providers the option to electronically consult with specialists. Uninsured patients may be seen by specialists in office visits for a defined set of services. This article describes the program, identifies aspects that have worked well and areas that need improvement, and offers lessons learned.

methodsWe quantified electronic consultations (e-consults) between safety-net clinicians and specialists, and face-to-face specialist visits between May 2013 and December 2014. We reviewed and categorized all e-consults from November and December 2014. In 2015, we interviewed 21 safety-net clinicians and staff, 12 specialists, and 10 patients, and conducted a thematic analysis to determine factors facilitating and limiting optimal program use.

resultsIn the first 20 months of the program, safety-net clinicians at 23 clinics made 602 e-consults to specialists, and 81 patients received face-to-face specialist visits. Of 204 primary care clinicians, 103 made e-consults; 65 specialists participated in the program. Aspects facilitating program use were referral case managers' involvement and the use of clear, concise questions in e-consults. Key recommendations for process improvement were to promote an understanding of the different health care contexts, support provider-to-provider communication, facilitate hand-offs between settings, and clarify program scope.

conclusionParticipants perceived the program as responsive to their needs, yet opportunities exist for continued uptake and expansion. Communitywide efforts to assess and address needs remain important.

Indexed as

Health ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityMedically UninsuredReferral and ConsultationSafety-net ProvidersSpecializationTelemedicineAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCase ManagementColoradoCommunicationComprehensive Health CareElectronicsFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID28241908
PMCPMC5283792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.