Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28241847›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2017

The accuracy of transcranial Doppler in excluding intracranial hypertension following acute brain injury: a multicenter prospective pilot study.

Frank A Rasulo, Rita Bertuetti, Chiara Robba, Francesco Lusenti, Alfredo Cantoni, Marta Bernini, Alan Girardini, Stefano Calza, Simone Piva, Nazzareno Fagoni and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Managing Intracranial Pressure Crisis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Brain health: A concern for anaesthesiologists and intensivists.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Frank A RasuloDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Spedali Civili University Hospital, Piazzale Ospedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy. francesco.rasulo@unibs.it.
Rita BertuettiDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Spedali Civili University Hospital, Piazzale Ospedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Chiara RobbaDepartment of Neuro Critical Care, Addenbrookes NHS Trust University Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Francesco LusentiDepartment of Neuro Critical Care, A. Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy.
Alfredo CantoniDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Circolo Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy.
Marta BerniniDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Hospital of Cisanello, Pisa, Italy.
Alan GirardiniDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione Poliambulanza Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Stefano CalzaUnit of Biostatistics, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Simone PivaDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Spedali Civili University Hospital, Piazzale Ospedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Nazzareno FagoniDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Spedali Civili University Hospital, Piazzale Ospedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Nicola LatronicoDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Spedali Civili University Hospital, Piazzale Ospedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUntimely diagnosis of intracranial hypertension may lead to delays in therapy and worsening of outcome. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) detects variations in cerebral blood flow velocity which may correlate with intracranial pressure (ICP). We investigated if intracranial hypertension can be accurately excluded through use of TCD.

methodThis was a multicenter prospective pilot study in patients with acute brain injury requiring invasive ICP (ICPi) monitoring. ICP estimated with TCD (ICPtcd) was compared with ICPi in three separate time frames: immediately before ICPi placement, immediately after ICPi placement, and 3 hours following ICPi positioning. Sensitivity and specificity, and concordance correlation coefficient between ICPi and ICPtcd were calculated. Receiver operating curve (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) analyses were estimated after measurement averaging over time.

resultsA total of 38 patients were enrolled, and of these 12 (31.6%) had at least one episode of intracranial hypertension. One hundred fourteen paired measurements of ICPi and ICPtcd were gathered for analysis. With dichotomized ICPi (≤20 mmHg vs >20 mmHg), the sensitivity of ICPtcd was 100%; all measurements with high ICPi (>20 mmHg) also had a high ICPtcd values. Bland-Altman plot showed an overestimation of 6.2 mmHg (95% CI 5.08-7.30 mmHg) for ICPtcd compared to ICPi. AUC was 96.0% (95% CI 89.8-100%) and the estimated best threshold was at ICPi of 24.8 mmHg corresponding to a sensitivity 100% and a specificity of 91.2%.

conclusionsThis study provides preliminary evidence that ICPtcd may accurately exclude intracranial hypertension in patients with acute brain injury. Future studies with adequate power are needed to confirm this result.

Indexed as

AgedBrain InjuriesFemaleHumansIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesROC CurveUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialBrain injuryIntracranial hypertensionIntracranial pressureTranscranial Doppler

Identifiers

PMID28241847
PMCPMC5329967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.