Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28241784›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2017

Genetic profiling for Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species in ticks collected in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa.

Benson C Iweriebor, Elia J Mmbaga, Abiodun Adegborioye, Aboi Igwaran, Larry C Obi, Anthony I Okoh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Distribution and Prevalence ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  13. Molecular Detection and Genetic Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Emergence ofHeliyon · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Benson C IwerieborSAMRC Microbial Water Quality Monitoring Centre, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa. benvida2004@yahoo.com.
Elia J MmbagaThe Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Abiodun AdegborioyeSAMRC Microbial Water Quality Monitoring Centre, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
Aboi IgwaranSAMRC Microbial Water Quality Monitoring Centre, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
Larry C ObiAcademic and Research Division, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.
Anthony I OkohSAMRC Microbial Water Quality Monitoring Centre, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
University of Fort Hare · ZAMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnaplasma and Ehrlichia are emerging tick-borne pathogens that cause anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis in humans and other animals worldwide. Infections caused by these pathogens are deadly if left untreated. There has been relatively no systematic survey of these pathogens among ticks in South Africa, thus necessitating this study. The presence of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species were demonstrated by PCR in ticks collected from domestic ruminants at some selected communities in the Eastern Cape of South Africa. The ticks were identified by morphological characteristics and thereafter processed to extract bacterial DNA, which was analyzed for the presence of genetic materials of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia.

resultsThree genera of ticks comprising five species were identified. The screening yielded 16 positive genetic materials that were phylogenetically related to Ehrlichia sequences obtained from GenBank, while no positive result was obtained for Anaplasma. The obtained Ehrlichia sequences were closely related to E. chaffeensis, E. canis, E. muris and the incompletely described Ehrlichia sp. UFMG-EV and Ehrlichia sp. UFMT.

conclusionThe findings showed that ticks in the studied areas were infected with Ehrlichia spp. and that the possibility of transmission to humans who might be tick infested is high.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnaplasmosisAnimalsBase SequenceCattleCattle DiseasesDNA, BacterialEhrlichiaEhrlichiosisGoat DiseasesGoatsHorse DiseasesHorsesPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnaplasmosisEhrlichiosisSouth AfricaTick-borne

Identifiers

PMID28241784
PMCPMC5327538
OpenAlexW2594239292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.