Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28241780›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Thromboelastometry versus standard coagulation tests versus restrictive protocol to guide blood transfusion prior to central venous catheterization in cirrhosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Leonardo Lima Rocha, Camila Menezes Souza Pessoa, Ary Serpa Neto, Rogerio Ruscitto do Prado, Eliezer Silva, Marcio Dias de Almeida, Thiago Domingos Correa, POCKET Trial Investigators

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02311985 (Point-of-care Versus Standard Coagulation Tests Versus Restrictive Strategy to Guide Transfusion in Chronic Liver Failure Patients Requiring Central Venous Line), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02311985 naterminatednot on this map

Point-of-care Versus Standard Coagulation Tests Versus Restrictive Strategy to Guide Transfusion in Chronic Liver Failure Patients Requiring Central Venous Line: Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Israelita Albert EinsteinRan2014 to 2016Enrolled57ConditionsLiver CirrhosisArmsCoagulogram-based protocol, Thromboelastometry-based protocol, Restrictive strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Detection of Hemostasis Abnormalities in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Thromboelastography.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Transfusion strategies in patients with cirrhosis.European journal of haematology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leonardo Lima RochaAdult Critical Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil. lrocha23@gmail.com.
Camila Menezes Souza PessoaAdult Critical Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ary Serpa NetoAdult Critical Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rogerio Ruscitto do PradoAdult Critical Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eliezer SilvaAdult Critical Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcio Dias de AlmeidaLiver Transplant Program, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thiago Domingos CorreaAdult Critical Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
POCKET Trial Investigators
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver failure patients have traditionally been empirically transfused prior to invasive procedures. Blood transfusion is associated with immunologic and nonimmunologic reactions, increased risk of adverse outcomes and high costs. Scientific evidence supporting empirical transfusion is lacking, and the best approach for blood transfusion prior to invasive procedures in cirrhotic patients has not been established so far. The aim of this study is to compare three transfusion strategies (routine coagulation test-guided - ordinary or restrictive, or thromboelastometry-guided) prior to central venous catheterization in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. METHODS/

designDesign and setting: a double-blinded, parallel-group, single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial in a tertiary private hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. INCLUSION CRITERIA: adults (aged 18 years or older) admitted to the intensive care unit with cirrhosis and an indication for central venous line insertion. Patients will be randomly assigned to three groups for blood transfusion strategy prior to central venous catheterization: standard coagulation tests-based, thromboelastometry-based, or restrictive. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the proportion of patients transfused with any blood product prior to central venous catheterization. The primary safety endpoint will be the incidence of major bleeding. Secondary endpoints will be the proportion of transfusion of fresh frozen plasma, platelets and cryoprecipitate; infused volume of blood products; hemoglobin and hematocrit before and after the procedure; intensive care unit and hospital length of stay; 28-day and hospital mortality; incidence of minor bleeding; transfusion-related adverse reactions; and cost analysis. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate three strategies to guide blood transfusion prior to central venous line placement in severely ill patients with cirrhosis. We hypothesized that thromboelastometry-based and/or restrictive protocols are safe and would significantly reduce transfusion of blood products in this population, leading to a reduction in costs and transfusion-related adverse reactions. In this manner, this trial will add evidence in favor of reducing empirical transfusion in severely ill patients with coagulopathy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02311985 . Retrospectively registered on 3 December 2014.

Indexed as

Blood CoagulationBlood TransfusionCatheterization, Central VenousThrombelastographyBlood Coagulation TestsBrazilClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisCritical IllnessDouble-Blind MethodHospital CostsHospital MortalityHospitals, PrivateHumansLength of StayLiver CirrhosisBlood coagulation testsBlood transfusionCatheterizationCentral venousClinical trialCritical careHemostatic disordersLiver failureThromboelastographyUltrasonographyVascular access devices

Identifiers

PMID28241780
PMCPMC5327508
OpenAlexW2590950903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.