Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28241776›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

The effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Gait Training versus conventional therapy on mobility in severely disabled progressIve MultiplE sclerosis patients (RAGTIME): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Sofia Straudi, Fabio Manfredini, Nicola Lamberti, Paolo Zamboni, Francesco Bernardi, Giovanna Marchetti, Paolo Pinton, Massimo Bonora, Paola Secchiero, Veronica Tisato and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02421731 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Robot-assisted Gait Training Versus Conventional Therapy on Mobility in Severely Disabled Multiple Sclerosis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital of FerraraRan2014 to 2018Enrolled72ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsRobot-assisted gait training, Conventional therapy
NCT03801473 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Robot-Assisted Gait Training and Conventional Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorSultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyRan2019 to 2020Enrolled42ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsrobot assisted gait therapy, Conventional rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sofia StraudiNeuroscience and Rehabilitation Department, Ferrara University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Fabio ManfrediniNeuroscience and Rehabilitation Department, Ferrara University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy. fabio.manfredini@unife.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9476-6434
Nicola LambertiDepartment of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Paolo ZamboniUnit of Translational Surgery and Vascular Diseases Center, Ferrara University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Francesco BernardiDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Giovanna MarchettiDepartment of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Paolo PintonDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Massimo BonoraDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Paola SecchieroDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Anatomy and Histology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Veronica TisatoDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Anatomy and Histology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Stefano VolpatoCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Nino BasagliaNeuroscience and Rehabilitation Department, Ferrara University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
University of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGait and mobility impairments affect the quality of life (QoL) of patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) is an effective rehabilitative treatment but evidence of its superiority compared to other options is lacking. Furthermore, the response to rehabilitation is multidimensional, person-specific and possibly involves functional reorganization processes. The aims of this study are: (1) to test the effectiveness on gait speed, mobility, balance, fatigue and QoL of RAGT compared to conventional therapy (CT) in progressive MS and (2) to explore changes of clinical and circulating biomarkers of neural plasticity.

methodsThis will be a parallel-group, randomized controlled trial design with the assessor blinded to the group allocation of participants. Ninety-eight (49 per arm) progressive MS patients (EDSS scale 6-7) will be randomly assigned to receive twelve 2-h training sessions over a 4-week period (three sessions/week) of either: (1) RAGT intervention on a robotic-driven gait orthosis (Lokomat, Hocoma, Switzerland). The training parameters (torque of the knee and hip drives, treadmill speed, body weight support) are set during the first session and progressively adjusted during training progression or (2) individual conventional physiotherapy focusing on over-ground walking training performed with the habitual walking device. The same assessors will perform outcome measurements at four time points: baseline (before the first intervention session); intermediate (after six training sessions); end of treatment (after the completion of 12 sessions); and follow-up (after 3 months from the end of the training program). The primary outcome is gait speed, assessed by the Timed 25-Foot Walk Test. We will also assess walking endurance, balance, depression, fatigue and QoL as well as instrumental laboratory markers (muscle metabolism, cerebral venous hemodynamics, cortical activation) and circulating laboratory markers (rare circulating cell populations pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, growth factors, neurotrophic factors, coagulation factors, other plasma proteins suggested by transcriptomic analysis and metabolic parameters). DISCUSSION: The RAGT training is expected to improve mobility compared to the active control intervention in progressive MS. Unique to this study is the analysis of various potential markers of plasticity in relation with clinical outcomes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02421731 . Registered on 19 January 2015 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

GaitMobility LimitationPersons with DisabilitiesRoboticsWalkingAdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkersBiomechanical PhenomenaClinical ProtocolsDisability EvaluationExercise TherapyExercise ToleranceFemaleHumansBiomarkersBiological markersMobilityMotor recoveryPlasticityProgressive multiple sclerosisRehabilitationRobot-assisted gait training

Identifiers

PMID28241776
PMCPMC5330064
OpenAlexW2592516559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.