Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28241759›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017

Smokers' and drinkers' choice of smartphone applications and expectations of engagement: a think aloud and interview study.

Olga Perski, Ann Blandford, Harveen Kaur Ubhi, Robert West, Susan Michie

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04590105 (The Impact of a Smartphone App on the Quality of Pediatric Colonoscopy Preparations), which is not on this map. Cited by 80 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04590105 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of a Smartphone App on the Quality of Pediatric Colonoscopy Preparations

TypeinterventionalSponsorStony Brook UniversityRan2014 to 2015Enrolled42ConditionsPediatric ALLArmsSmartphone App "SB Colonoscopy Prep", Written Instruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mapping the Process of Engagement With Digital Health Interventions: A Cross-Case Synthesis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olga PerskiDepartment of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. olga.perski.14@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3285-3174
Ann BlandfordUCL Interaction Centre, University College London, 66-72 Gower Street, London, WC1E 6EA, UK.
Harveen Kaur UbhiDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Robert WestDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Susan MichieDepartment of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22962Cancer Research UK C1417/A14135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic health organisations such as the National Health Service in the United Kingdom and the National Institutes of Health in the United States provide access to online libraries of publicly endorsed smartphone applications (apps); however, there is little evidence that users rely on this guidance. Rather, one of the most common methods of finding new apps is to search an online store. As hundreds of smoking cessation and alcohol-related apps are currently available on the market, smokers and drinkers must actively choose which app to download prior to engaging with it. The influences on this choice are yet to be identified. This study aimed to investigate 1) design features that shape users' choice of smoking cessation or alcohol reduction apps, and 2) design features judged to be important for engagement.

methodsAdult smokers (n = 10) and drinkers (n = 10) interested in using an app to quit/cut down were asked to search an online store to identify and explore a smoking cessation or alcohol reduction app of their choice whilst thinking aloud. Semi-structured interview techniques were used to allow participants to elaborate on their statements. An interpretivist theoretical framework informed the analysis. Verbal reports were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants chose apps based on their immediate look and feel, quality as judged by others' ratings and brand recognition ('social proof'), and titles judged to be realistic and relevant. Monitoring and feedback, goal setting, rewards and prompts were identified as important for engagement, fostering motivation and autonomy. Tailoring of content, a non-judgmental communication style, privacy and accuracy were viewed as important for engagement, fostering a sense of personal relevance and trust. Sharing progress on social media and the use of craving management techniques in social settings were judged not to be engaging because of concerns about others' negative reactions.

conclusionsChoice of a smoking cessation or alcohol reduction app may be influenced by its immediate look and feel, 'social proof' and titles that appear realistic. Design features that enhance motivation, autonomy, personal relevance and credibility may be important for engagement.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorMobile ApplicationsSmoking CessationAdultAlcohol DrinkingFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedSmartphoneSmokingTelemedicineTherapy, Computer-AssistedThinkingYoung AdultAlcohol reductionBehaviour changeEngagementExcessive alcohol consumptionmHealthSmartphone appsSmoking cessationThematic analysisThink aloud

Identifiers

PMID28241759
PMCPMC5329928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.