Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28241443›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Emerging Cytokine Biosensors with Optical Detection Modalities and Nanomaterial-Enabled Signal Enhancement.

Manpreet Singh, Johnson Truong, W Brian Reeves, Jong-In Hahm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cytokines: From Clinical Significance to Quantification.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CdSSe nanowire-chip based wearable sweat sensor.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manpreet SinghDepartment of Chemistry, Georgetown University, 37th & O Sts. NW., Washington, DC 20057, USA. mks73@georgetown.edu.
Johnson TruongDepartment of Chemistry, Georgetown University, 37th & O Sts. NW., Washington, DC 20057, USA. jtt37@georgetown.edu.
W Brian ReevesDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA. ReevesW@UTHSCSA.edu.
Jong-In HahmDepartment of Chemistry, Georgetown University, 37th & O Sts. NW., Washington, DC 20057, USA. jh583@georgetown.edu.

Funding

ZnO Nanorod-based Early Biomarker Screening for Acute Kidney InjuryR01DK088016 · NIDDK · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI HAHM, JONG-IN · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK088016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein biomarkers, especially cytokines, play a pivotal role in the diagnosis and treatment of a wide spectrum of diseases. Therefore, a critical need for advanced cytokine sensors has been rapidly growing and will continue to expand to promote clinical testing, new biomarker development, and disease studies. In particular, sensors employing transduction principles of various optical modalities have emerged as the most common means of detection. In typical cytokine assays which are based on the binding affinities between the analytes of cytokines and their specific antibodies, optical schemes represent the most widely used mechanisms, with some serving as the gold standard against which all existing and new sensors are benchmarked. With recent advancements in nanoscience and nanotechnology, many of the recently emerging technologies for cytokine detection exploit various forms of nanomaterials for improved sensing capabilities. Nanomaterials have been demonstrated to exhibit exceptional optical properties unique to their reduced dimensionality. Novel sensing approaches based on the newly identified properties of nanomaterials have shown drastically improved performances in both the qualitative and quantitative analyses of cytokines. This article brings together the fundamentals in the literature that are central to different optical modalities developed for cytokine detection. Recent advancements in the applications of novel technologies are also discussed in terms of those that enable highly sensitive and multiplexed cytokine quantification spanning a wide dynamic range. For each highlighted optical technique, its current detection capabilities as well as associated challenges are discussed. Lastly, an outlook for nanomaterial-based cytokine sensors is provided from the perspective of optimizing the technologies for sensitivity and multiplexity as well as promoting widespread adaptations of the emerging optical techniques by lowering high thresholds currently present in the new approaches.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesCytokinesHumansNanostructuresNanotechnologyCytokinescolorimetrycytokine sensorELISAevanescent wavefluorescencenanobiosensoroptical protein sensoroptical waveguidephotonic crystalsurface plasmon resonance

Identifiers

PMID28241443
PMCPMC5335944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.