ArticleJAMA dermatology2017
Outcomes of Melanoma In Situ Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery Compared With Wide Local Excision.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients With Melanoma In Situ.JAMA dermatology · 2025Article
- Advantages of Mohs Surgery in the Treatment of NMSC in the Head and Neck District.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Improved Survival in Skin Cancer: A Narrative Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Review
- Risk factors associated with tumor upstaging in melanomas treated with Mohs micrographic surgery with melanocytic immunohistochemistry.JAAD international · 2024Article
- Reconstruction after Mohs Surgery for Digit Melanoma: Description of Techniques and Postoperative Limb Function.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2024Article
- Disease-specific survival of malignant melanoma after Mohs micrographic surgery is not impacted by initial margins: A systematic review and meta-analysis.JAAD international · 2023Article
- Review
- A retrospective review of Mohs micrographic surgery trends over more than 10 years in Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2023Article
- Cost effectiveness of melanoma in situ resection and repair by dermatology compared to non-dermatology specialties at a single institution.Archives of dermatological research · 2023Article
- Association between excision margins and local recurrence in 1407 patients with primary in situ melanomas.JAAD international · 2022Article
- Novel Photo- and Thermo-Responsive Nanocomposite Hydrogels Based on Functionalized rGO and Modified SIS/Chitosan Polymers for Localized Treatment of Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Malignant melanoma: evolving practice management in an era of increasingly effective systemic therapies.Current problems in surgery · 2022Review
- Comparison of photoacoustic imaging and histopathological examination in determining the dimensions of 52 human melanomas and neviBiomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Protocol for the Histologic Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus Statement of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) for the National Cutaneous Melanoma Registry.Actas dermo-sifiliograficas · 2021Article
- Red Nodule in a Post-surgical Scar: A Quiz.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2020Article
- The Evolution of Care of Cancers of the Head and Neck Region: State of the Science in 2020.Cancers · 2020Review
- Histological Peripheral Margins and Recurrence of Melanoma In Situ Treated with Wide Local Excision.Journal of skin cancer · 2020Article
- Patient indications for Mohs micrographic surgery: a clinical practice guideline.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019Article
- NEO412: A temozolomide analog with transdermal activity in melanomaOncotarget · 2018Article
- Current perspectives on Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Melanoma in situ (MIS) is increasing in incidence, and expert consensus opinion recommends surgical excision for therapeutic management. Currently, wide local excision (WLE) is the standard of care. However, Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is now used to treat a growing subset of individuals with MIS. During MMS, unlike WLE, the entire cutaneous surgical margin is evaluated intraoperatively for tumor cells. Objective: To assess the outcomes of patients with MIS treated with MMS compared with those treated with WLE. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective review of a prospective database. The study cohort consisted of 662 patients with MIS treated with MMS or WLE per standard of care in dermatology and surgery (general surgery, otolaryngology, plastics, oculoplastics, surgical oncology) at an academic tertiary care referral center from January 1, 1978, to December 31, 2013, with follow-up through 2015. Exposure: Mohs micrographic surgery or WLE. Main Outcomes and Measures: Recurrence, overall survival, and melanoma-specific survival. Results: There were 277 patients treated with MMS (mean [SD] age, 64.0 [13.1] years; 62.1% male) and 385 treated with WLE (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [15.6] years; P < .001 for age; 54.8% male). Median follow-up was 8.6 (range, 0.2-37) years. Compared with WLE, MMS was used more frequently on the face (222 [80.2%] vs 141 [36.7%]) and scalp and neck (23 [8.3%] vs 26 [6.8%]; P < .001). The median (range) year of diagnosis was 2008 (1986-2013) for the MMS group vs 2003 (1978-2013) for the WLE group (P < .001). Overall recurrence rates were 5 (1.8%) in the MMS group and 22 (5.7%) in the WLE group (P = .07). Mean (SD) time to recurrence after MMS was 3.91 (4.4) years, and after WLE, 4.45 (2.7) years (P = .73). The 5-year recurrence rate was 1.1% in the MMS group and 4.1% in the WLE group (P = .07). For WLE-treated tumors, the surgical margin taken was greater for tumors that recurred compared with tumors that did not recur (P = .003). Five-year overall survival for MMS was 92% and for WLE was 94% (P = .28). Melanoma-specific mortality for the MMS group was 2 vs 13 patients for the WLE group, with mean (SD) survival of 6.5 (4.8) and 6.1 (0.8) years, respectively (P = .77). Conclusions and Relevance: No significant differences were found in the recurrence rate, overall survival, or melanoma-specific survival of patients with MIS treated with MMS compared with WLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.