SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2017
Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05182515 (Interest of Plasma Exchange in Patients With Anti-interferon Type 1 Autoantibodies With Severe COVID-19 -), which is not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interest of Plasma Exchange in Patients With Anti-interferon Type 1 Autoantibodies With Severe COVID-19 -
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach From the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Tenth Special Issue.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Guideline
- Clinical Performance Measures for Neurocritical Care: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.Neurocritical care · 2020Pooled it
- Pharmacological treatment other than corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Multidisciplinary care for Guillain-Barré syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- If it does not help, it might hurt: Pharmacodynamics of a second IVIg course in Guillain-Barré syndrome.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Trial
- Small volume plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome in resource-limited settings: a phase II safety and feasibility study.BMJ open · 2018Trial
- Therapeutic plasma exchange without anticoagulation: Single-center experience.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026Article
- Reply to the Editor.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Guillain-Barré syndrome following Plasmodium falciparum malaria in a child: a case report.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Acute Management of Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Clinical response of acute idiopathic polyradiculoneuritis treated with therapeutic plasma exchange in four dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Rapid neurological recovery in Guillain-Barré syndrome treated with efgartigimod.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Modulation of Cytokines and Immune Cells by Plasma Exchange in Patients With Certain Autoimmune Neurological Diseases.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Patient Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Guillain-Barré Syndrome.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2026Article
- Case Report: Guillain-Barré syndrome mimicking acute brainstem stroke with severe autonomic dysfunction-complete recovery after early plasma exchange.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic plasma exchange across multiple organ systems in an Egyptian tertiary center: A seven-year real-world cohort study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Living Through Acute Helplessness and Ongoing Recovery: A Phenomenological Study of Patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome Undergoing Therapeutic Plasma Exchange.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Efgartigimod as a potential alternative to intravenous immunoglobulin in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a retrospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and safety of efgartigimod in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a retrospective observation study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute paralysing disease caused by peripheral nerve inflammation. This is an update of a review first published in 2001 and last updated in 2012.
objectivesTo assess the effects of plasma exchange for treating GBS. SEARCH
methodsOn 18 January 2016 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We also searched clinical trials registries. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of plasma exchange versus sham exchange or supportive treatment, or comparing different regimens or techniques of plasma exchange. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN
resultsIn the first version of this review there were six eligible trials concerning 649 participants comparing plasma exchange with supportive treatment. No new eligible trials have been identified in subsequent updates. Two other studies compared different numbers of plasma exchanges. Overall the included trials had a moderate risk of bias (in general, the studies were at low risk but all had a high risk of bias from lack of blinding).In one trial with 220 severely affected participants, the median time to recover walking with aid was significantly shorter with plasma exchange (30 days) than without plasma exchange (44 days). In another trial with 91 mildly affected participants, the median time to onset of motor recovery was significantly shorter with plasma exchange (six days) than without plasma exchange (10 days). After four weeks, moderate-quality evidence from the combined data of three trials accounting for a total of 349 patients showed that plasma exchange significantly increased the proportion of patients who recovered the ability to walk with assistance (risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 2.15).In five trials with 623 participants in total, moderate-quality evidence showed that the RR for improvement by one or more disability grades after four weeks was 1.64 (95% CI 1.37 to 1.96) times greater with plasma exchange. Participants treated with plasma exchange also fared better, according to moderate-quality evidence, in time to recover walking without aid (three trials with 349 participants; RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.79) and requirement for artificial ventilation (five trials with 623 participants; RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.74). More participants had relapses by the end of follow-up in the plasma exchange group than in the control group (six trials with 649 participants; RR 2.89, 95% CI 1.05 to 7.93; moderate-quality evidence). Despite this, according to moderate-quality evidence, the likelihood of full muscle strength recovery at one year was greater with plasma exchange than without plasma exchange (five trials with 404 participants; RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.45), and the likelihood of severe motor sequelae was less (six trials with 649 participants; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.96). High-quality evidence from six trials with 649 participants could not confirm or refute a lower risk of death following plasma exchange compared to control (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.65).Three trials (N = 556) provided details of serious adverse events during the hospital stay; combined analyses found no increase in serious infectious events compared to the control group (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.13), nor were there clear differences in blood pressure instability, cardiac arrhythmias or pulmonary emboli. AUTHORS'
conclusionsModerate-quality evidence shows significantly more improvement with plasma exchange than with supportive care alone in adults with Guillain-Barré syndrome, without a significant increase in serious adverse events. According to moderate-quality evidence, there was a small but significant increase in the risk of relapse during the first six to 12 months after onset in people treated with plasma exchange compared with those who were not treated. Despite this, after one year, full recovery of muscle strength was more likely and severe residual weakness less likely with plasma exchange.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.