Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28241090›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2017

Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Sylvie Chevret, Richard Ac Hughes, Djillali Annane

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05182515 (Interest of Plasma Exchange in Patients With Anti-interferon Type 1 Autoantibodies With Severe COVID-19 -), which is not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05182515 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Interest of Plasma Exchange in Patients With Anti-interferon Type 1 Autoantibodies With Severe COVID-19 -

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier St AnneRan2021 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsTherapeutic plasma exchange
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Multidisciplinary care for Guillain-Barré syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Therapeutic plasma exchange without anticoagulation: Single-center experience.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026
    Article
  8. Reply to the Editor.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Acute Management of Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Patient Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Guillain-Barré Syndrome.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sylvie ChevretDepartement de Biostatistique et Informatique Médicale, Hôpital Saint Louis, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475 Paris, France, Cedex 10.
Richard Ac HughesMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, PO Box 114, Queen Square, London, UK, WC1N 3BG.
Djillali AnnaneCritical Care Department, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 104. Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, Garches, Ile de France, France, 92380.
Hôpital Raymond-Poincaré · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute paralysing disease caused by peripheral nerve inflammation. This is an update of a review first published in 2001 and last updated in 2012.

objectivesTo assess the effects of plasma exchange for treating GBS. SEARCH

methodsOn 18 January 2016 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We also searched clinical trials registries. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of plasma exchange versus sham exchange or supportive treatment, or comparing different regimens or techniques of plasma exchange. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN

resultsIn the first version of this review there were six eligible trials concerning 649 participants comparing plasma exchange with supportive treatment. No new eligible trials have been identified in subsequent updates. Two other studies compared different numbers of plasma exchanges. Overall the included trials had a moderate risk of bias (in general, the studies were at low risk but all had a high risk of bias from lack of blinding).In one trial with 220 severely affected participants, the median time to recover walking with aid was significantly shorter with plasma exchange (30 days) than without plasma exchange (44 days). In another trial with 91 mildly affected participants, the median time to onset of motor recovery was significantly shorter with plasma exchange (six days) than without plasma exchange (10 days). After four weeks, moderate-quality evidence from the combined data of three trials accounting for a total of 349 patients showed that plasma exchange significantly increased the proportion of patients who recovered the ability to walk with assistance (risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 2.15).In five trials with 623 participants in total, moderate-quality evidence showed that the RR for improvement by one or more disability grades after four weeks was 1.64 (95% CI 1.37 to 1.96) times greater with plasma exchange. Participants treated with plasma exchange also fared better, according to moderate-quality evidence, in time to recover walking without aid (three trials with 349 participants; RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.79) and requirement for artificial ventilation (five trials with 623 participants; RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.74). More participants had relapses by the end of follow-up in the plasma exchange group than in the control group (six trials with 649 participants; RR 2.89, 95% CI 1.05 to 7.93; moderate-quality evidence). Despite this, according to moderate-quality evidence, the likelihood of full muscle strength recovery at one year was greater with plasma exchange than without plasma exchange (five trials with 404 participants; RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.45), and the likelihood of severe motor sequelae was less (six trials with 649 participants; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.96). High-quality evidence from six trials with 649 participants could not confirm or refute a lower risk of death following plasma exchange compared to control (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.65).Three trials (N = 556) provided details of serious adverse events during the hospital stay; combined analyses found no increase in serious infectious events compared to the control group (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.13), nor were there clear differences in blood pressure instability, cardiac arrhythmias or pulmonary emboli. AUTHORS'

conclusionsModerate-quality evidence shows significantly more improvement with plasma exchange than with supportive care alone in adults with Guillain-Barré syndrome, without a significant increase in serious adverse events. According to moderate-quality evidence, there was a small but significant increase in the risk of relapse during the first six to 12 months after onset in people treated with plasma exchange compared with those who were not treated. Despite this, after one year, full recovery of muscle strength was more likely and severe residual weakness less likely with plasma exchange.

Indexed as

Plasma ExchangeGuillain-Barre SyndromeHumansMuscle StrengthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionRecurrenceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28241090
PMCPMC6464100
OpenAlexW2912224003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.