Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28241039›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

The genotype-phenotype map of an evolving digital organism.

Miguel A Fortuna, Luis Zaman, Charles Ofria, Andreas Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Six million years of vole dental evolution shaped by tooth development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Evolution takes multiple paths to evolvability when facing environmental change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Insertions and deletions in the RNA sequence-structure map.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Protein ensembles link genotype to phenotype.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Review
  17. The architecture of an empirical genotype-phenotype map.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Non-adaptive origins of evolutionary innovations increase network complexity in interacting digital organisms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Miguel A FortunaDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8374-1941
Luis ZamanDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Charles OfriaBEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2924-1732
Andreas WagnerDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michigan State University · USSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand how evolving systems bring forth novel and useful phenotypes, it is essential to understand the relationship between genotypic and phenotypic change. Artificial evolving systems can help us understand whether the genotype-phenotype maps of natural evolving systems are highly unusual, and it may help create evolvable artificial systems. Here we characterize the genotype-phenotype map of digital organisms in Avida, a platform for digital evolution. We consider digital organisms from a vast space of 10141 genotypes (instruction sequences), which can form 512 different phenotypes. These phenotypes are distinguished by different Boolean logic functions they can compute, as well as by the complexity of these functions. We observe several properties with parallels in natural systems, such as connected genotype networks and asymmetric phenotypic transitions. The likely common cause is robustness to genotypic change. We describe an intriguing tension between phenotypic complexity and evolvability that may have implications for biological evolution. On the one hand, genotypic change is more likely to yield novel phenotypes in more complex organisms. On the other hand, the total number of novel phenotypes reachable through genotypic change is highest for organisms with simple phenotypes. Artificial evolving systems can help us study aspects of biological evolvability that are not accessible in vastly more complex natural systems. They can also help identify properties, such as robustness, that are required for both human-designed artificial systems and synthetic biological systems to be evolvable.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypeBiological EvolutionComputer SimulationSelection, GeneticSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

PMID28241039
PMCPMC5348039
OpenAlexW2593447578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.