Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28241027›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2017

Benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma: A myth or a reality?

Satoru Taguchi, Sebastiano Buti, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Masafumi Otsuka, Melissa Bersanelli, Teppei Morikawa, Hideyo Miyazaki, Tohru Nakagawa, Tetsuya Fujimura, Haruki Kume and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Survival improvement over time in renal cell carcinoma treated with nephrectomy: A longitudinal propensity score-matched study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Satoru TaguchiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Sebastiano ButiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Hiroshi FukuharaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masafumi OtsukaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Melissa BersanelliMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Teppei MorikawaDepartment of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideyo MiyazakiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tohru NakagawaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya FujimuraDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruki KumeDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhiko IgawaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukio HommaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy after nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. The present study aimed to examine the possible benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy in various clinical settings.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 436 patients with pT1-3N0-2M0 RCC who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy with curative intent at our institution between 1981 and 2009. Of them, 98 (22.5%) patients received adjuvant interferon-α (IFN-α) after surgery (adjuvant IFN-α group), while 338 (77.5%) did not (control group). The primary endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively.

resultsFifty-two (11.9%) patients died from RCC with a median follow-up period of 96 months. Preliminary univariate analyses comparing CSS among treatment groups in each TNM setting revealed that CSS in the control group was equal or superior to that in the adjuvant IFN-α group in earlier stages, while the opposite trend was observed in more advanced stages. We evaluated the TNM cutoffs and demonstrated maximized benefit of adjuvant IFN-α in patients with pT2b-3cN0 (P = 0.0240). In multivariate analysis, ≥pT3 and pN1-2 were independent predictors for poor CSS in all patients. In the subgroups with ≥pT2 disease (n = 123), pN1-2 and no adjuvant treatment were significant poor prognostic factors.

conclusionsAdjuvant immunotherapy after nephrectomy may be beneficial in pT2b-3cN0 RCC. Careful consideration is, however, required for interpretation of this observational study because of its selection bias and adverse effects of IFN-α.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAgedCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansImmunotherapyInterferon-alphaJapanKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingNephrectomyAdjuvants, ImmunologicInterferon-alpha

Identifiers

PMID28241027
PMCPMC5328261
OpenAlexW2594186778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.