Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28240928›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2017

Adding details to the attentional template offsets search difficulty: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Joseph Schmidt, Gregory J Zelinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How expectations alter search performance.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Incidental memory following rapid object processing: The role of attention allocation strategies.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joseph SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida.
Gregory J ZelinskyDepartment of Psychology and Computer Science, Stony Brook University.

Funding

Eye movements during real-world visual search: A behavioral & computational studyR01MH063748 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI ZELINSKY, GREGORY J · 2002 to 2013
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated how expected search difficultly affects the attentional template by having participants search for a teddy bear target among either other teddy bears (difficult search, high target-distractor similarity) or random nonbear objects (easy search, low target-distractor similarity). Target previews were identical in these 2 blocked conditions, and target-related visual working memory (VWM) load was measured using contralateral delay activity (CDA), an event-related potential indicating VWM load. CDA was assessed after target designation but before search display onset. Shortly after preview offset, the expectation of a difficult search produced a target-related CDA, suggesting the encoding and maintenance of target details in VWM. However, no differences in CDA were found immediately before search onset, suggesting a flexible and efficient weighting of the templates' features to reflect the expected demands of the search task. Moreover, CDA amplitude correlated with eye movement measures of search guidance in difficult search trials but not easy trials, suggesting that the utility of the attentional template is greater for more difficult searches. These findings are evidence that attentional templates depend on expected task difficulty, and that people may compensate for a more difficult search by adding details to their target representation in VWM, as measured by CDA. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

AdultAttentionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsEye Movement MeasurementsHumansMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28240928
PMCPMC13197200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.