Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28240416›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2017

Meeting radiation therapy patients informational needs through educational videos augmented by 3D visualisation software.

Katelyn Williams, Jenna Blencowe, Melissa Ind, David Willis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of patient information format on the experience of cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Technical note: A collision prediction tool using Blender.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Virtual Reality-Based Education for Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katelyn WilliamsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, North West Cancer Centre, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9177-1481
Jenna BlencoweDepartment of Radiation Oncology, North West Cancer Centre, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
Melissa IndDepartment of Radiation Oncology, North West Cancer Centre, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
David WillisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, North West Cancer Centre, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMisconceptions and uncertainties about radiotherapy compound the anxiety patients experience at the commencement of treatment. This project investigated the utility of locally produced treatment process videos in meeting patients' informational needs.

methodsIn-house video production was conducted on a voluntary basis by staff and patients at a regional Australian radiotherapy centre. Videos included real footage and animated sections created with PEARL

resultsThe survey completion rate was 29% (n = 61/212). Surveys were collected over 9 months from August 2014 to April 2015. Statistical analysis found 98% of patients reported that the video was useful in meeting one or more of the learning objectives. Forty-nine percent of patients also reported a reduction in fear and anxiety as a result of watching the video. Patients reported subsequent review of videos at home (39%), primarily to explain treatment processes to loved ones (46%).

conclusionThe combination of real footage and 3D visualisation software assisted in meeting learning objectives regarding the treatment process. Standardised videos provided consistency of information provision to patients and facilitated multiple viewings of the video if desired.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalProgram EvaluationRadiotherapySoftwareVideo RecordingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInformation DisseminationMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesConsumer health informationinformation disseminationinstructional films and videospatient engagementradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28240416
PMCPMC5355370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.